Vesti
Sport
Celebrity
Lifestyle
Diskusije
Kuvar
Oglasi
Diskusije
:
Politika
+4 / -6
-2
92 posto umrlih od kovida 2022. je primilo 3 doze
Zorrko
08. jun 2023. u 19.55
Nova državna statistika otkrila je da je nevjerovatnih 92 posto ljudi koji su umrli od Covida 2022. godine imalo najmanje tri doze vakcina
Sjećate li se kada su govorili „ako ste vakcinisani, nećete dobiti Covid, niti ćete umrijeti od Covida”?
https://tinyurl.com/3wajn828
+4 / -6
-2
Zorrko
08. jun 2023. u 19.58
Glavni direktor WHO-a, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus najavljuje digitalne potvrde o vakcini za imunizaciju koje će biti potrebne za sudjelovanje u društvu.
https://tinyurl.com/spbyeuh3
Samo teorija zavjere?
+3 / -7
-4
Zorrko
Poruka negativno ocenjena.
Pokaži
Zorrko
08. jun 2023. u 20.02
Dr. Joseph Mercola:
Smrtna zamka covid bolnica u režiji SZO...
Sedmicama nakon izbijanja pandemije, postalo je očito da je standardna praksa stavljanja pacijenata s COVID-19 na mehaničku ventilaciju smrtna kazna.
Umrlo je 76,4% pacijenata s COVID-19 (u dobi od 18 do 65 godina) u New Yorku koji su bili stavljeni na respiratore. Među pacijentima starijim od 65 godina koji su bili na respiratoru, stopa smrtnosti bila je 97,2%.
Preporuka da se bolesnici s COVID-om stave na mehaničku ventilaciju kao prva linija odgovora došla je od Svjetske zdravstvene organizacije, koja je svoje smjernice navodno temeljila na iskustvima i preporukama liječnika u Kini. Ali nije se preporučalo odzračivanje pacijenata s COVID-om jer je to povećalo preživljavanje. Želja mu je bila zaštititi zdravstvene radnike izolacijom virusa unutar ventilacijskog stroja.
Podaci upućuju na to da je oko 10 000 pacijenata umrlo od COVID-a u bolnicama u New Yorku nakon što su stavljeni na respiratore u proljeće 2020. U drugim metropolitanskim područjima također su zabilježeni veliki skokovi smrti među mlađim pojedincima koji su bili pod niskim rizikom smrti od COVID-a. Moguće je da su mnoge od tih smrti bile rezultat stavljanja na mehaničku ventilaciju (vidi grafikon u nastavku).
WHO se mora smatrati odgovornom za svoju neetičku preporuku da se žrtvuju pacijenti za koje se sumnja da su zaraženi COVID-om korištenjem ventilacije kao strategije za ublažavanje infekcije - posebno imajući u vidu da sada pokušavaju dobiti jednostranu moć i ovlasti za donošenje odluka o pandemiji bez lokalnog doprinosa.
https://tinyurl.com/yk3j8u9c
+2 / -1
+1
Simo
08. jun 2023. u 20.12
Nedostatak strucnih vatrogasaca za sumske pozare.
Lokalni opstinski vatrogasci nisu nadlezni, obuceni niti u dovoljnom broju raspoloživi.
Specijci koji za ove pozare su uglavnom na sezonskom ugovoru i znatno manje placeni od redovnih. Međunarodna pomoć je dobrodosla i nije potreban papir o vakcinaciji.
The american dream is becoming the american nightmare.
+5 / -2
+3
Pjer
(svratio samo na 5 minuta)
08. jun 2023. u 22.05
„ONS has published data showing unvaccinated had a higher COVID-19 mortality rate than those who had had any vaccination and those who had had a third dose or booster at least 21 days ago”
Zorrko, sto bolan citiras samo pola clanka? Ovo iznad si preskocio.
Taj procenat može da znači da je ukupno umrlo 25 vakcinisanih. I 92% njih ( 23) je bilo vakcinisano 3 puta.
Nevakcinisani su umirali vise od vakcinisanih piše u linku.
+5 / -1
+4
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
08. jun 2023. u 23.28
Pjer,
>'Zorrko, sto bolan citiras samo pola clanka?'
- - -
Зато што је болан у главу.
+3 / -2
+1
bezdomni
(maestro)
09. jun 2023. u 04.05
Idiot ne znam zašto mu ne opale ban na 5 godina 🤓
+1 / -2
-1
zoxthegreat
09. jun 2023. u 05.15
a vi kao čitate sve
„You're not going to get Covid if you have these vaccinations.”
neko se na tviteru poziva na neke clanke koji se opet naslanjaju na neke desete i sad vi trazite istinu.
ako se prevede samo naslov ona se tumaci kako je zorrko protumacio
svako vidi on sto misli da je ispravno bez uvida u cinjenice
koje je teško dobiti
zorrko misli da su vakc zavera a neki od vas ne
ja znam po prici ljudi koji rade samno da su neke njihove komsije
ili poznanici, uglavnom mladji muskarci do 30 god, dobili zdravstvene probleme veoma naglo posle vak, uglavnom aritmija srca
za smrtne sucajeve nisam čuo osim na internetu
+0 / -0
0
kt61
(*BCM)
09. jun 2023. u 07.35
https://nypost.com/2020/08/28/engineer-creates-ai-jesus-that-makes-doomsday-prophecies/
+1 / -3
-2
Zorrko
09. jun 2023. u 11.00
-------
Pjer
(svratio samo na 5 minuta)
08. jun 2023. u 22.05
Zorrko, sto bolan citiras samo pola clanka? Ovo iznad si preskocio.
-----------
samo ti bolan drzi i dalje glavu u pijesku...(ako ti je tako lakse)
+0 / -2
-2
C_A_B_O
09. jun 2023. u 14.17
PRICAM ja maaaaali, BOGORADIM i pokusavam da OPASULJIM SRPSTVO izvan Srbije! NE spricajte se BRACO!...„octetel' da vam unucad budu neplodna? Da NEMATE 3će POTOMSTVO?
BIRAJTE! ”
+3 / -1
+2
D-Man
(Analyst)
09. jun 2023. u 14.38
„...octetel' da vam unucad budu neplodna?”
Хвала Богу, родило се дечице колико хоћеш у последњих неколико месеци. Сва та дечица зачета након што су им родитељи добили ту вакцину која је, по дежурним ''душебрижнцима'' требала изазвати неплодност.
Али, јбг, сад видим по неким коментарима да та вакцина, у ствари, треба да изазове неплодност код следеће генерације (унучади) а не сада код наше деце. Ето, сада требамо чекати још неких 20, 25 или 30 година па да се уверимо како су ове злослутне сове биле у праву, је ли!?
Јбг, људи, стварно претерујете! Дајте бар мало смањите тај доживљај и стравичне сценарије које предвиђате.
Аутору ове теме не вреди ништа рећи. Пјер га лепо поклопи и пита зашто није пренео целу информацију а он каже Пјеру да он може и даље да настави да гура главу у песак!!! Шта да човек каже на такве речи?
Пре пар дана овде умро један млад човек (рођак од колега са посла). Срчани удар, човек у најбољим годинама. Зоррко би одмах објавио ту информацију сумњајући како је крива ковид вакцинација. Али, не лези враже! У разговору са колегом на послу (чији је рођак умро) сазнам да је тај његов рођак од малена имао проблема са срцем и да је пре пар месеци оперисан. По Зоррку је, наравно, највероватније крива вакцинација а не то што је човек имао срчане проблеме од малих ногу.
+1 / -3
-2
C_A_B_O
09. jun 2023. u 14.44
MAJMUNE slEEEEEpi... pricam o SLECEOJ generaciji!
SPRICAJTE se MAJMUNI... NECETE imati UNICADI sposbne da proizvede potomstvo!
A TI, MAJMUNE nemaj UNUKA sa simovima! I xxxxxebi ODAVLE!
+2 / -2
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
09. jun 2023. u 15.37
C_A_B_O,
За разлику од твојих збућканих и нејасних коментара, D-Man је врло јасно изнео своје мишљење - није његова кривица што ти збркано пишеш и не разумеш оно што други пишу. Кад си већ тако осорно упутио „комплимент” саговорнику, који је јасно приговорио поводом твог коментара, да ће последице вакцинисања да се осете у следећој генерацији, да ли схваташ да си, у ствари, показао да тај „комплимент” може да се примени на тебе ?
Објасни, ако је икако могуће, на основу којих расположивих података си тако сигуран да ће последице да погоде будуће генерације ?
Да ниси неки путник кроз време, па нам шаљеш поруке из будућности, да се опасуљимо ?
Како то да видиш будућност, а ниси у стању да видиш стварност у садашњости ?
Или прихваташ оно што неки каче по друштвеним мрежама, а не видиш шта се догађа(ло) у стварности у садашњем и блиском прошлом времену ?
И сад ви, такви, нама „отварате очи” и пребацујете да држимо главе у песку !?
+1 / -3
-2
C_A_B_O
09. jun 2023. u 15.52
TKZ neHjasni komentari SU POZIV za OTVORANJE ociju i razmišljanje SVOJIM umom a NE televiziJskim.
PAMETNIM dosta IDIJOTIMA..SSPRICAJTE SE!
+2 / -1
+1
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
09. jun 2023. u 16.00
zoxthegreat,
>'a vi kao čitate sve
„You're not going to get Covid if you have these vaccinations.”
neko se na tviteru poziva na neke clanke koji se opet naslanjaju na neke desete i sad vi trazite istinu.
ako se prevede samo naslov ona se tumaci kako je zorrko protumacio'
- - -
На тараби пише „Банка”, а неки стали у ред да узму кредите. ;)
Не могу да говорим у име осталих, али могу да кажем да сам од оних који прате сасвим довољно да могу да уоче свесно формулисане подвале у формулацијама наслова и тумачењу званичних саопштења, или погрешне закључке надобудних антиваксера.
Симптоматично је да „неко” систематски поставља линкове који воде ка вестима, или порукама са претенциозно и бомбастично формулисаним насловима и/или намерно погрешно тумаченим извештајима, а да претходно не провери веродостојност садржаја !?
Неке од таквих „вести” су упадљиво чудне, да просто не могу да се прихвате без провере у више различитих извора.
+2 / -1
+1
CPHA
(Чувари ћирилице)
09. jun 2023. u 16.28
Чињеница је да се подижу тужбе у Америци против Фајзера и др. у вези ковид вакцина. То се лако може испратити и доступно је свима. Проблем који је актуелан, а већ су неки и добили на суду да ГМ вакцине нису против короне. За шта су остаје да се сазна.
Пратити траг новца...доноси одговоре на нека питања.
+1 / -3
-2
zoxthegreat
09. jun 2023. u 19.36
„Не могу да говорим у име осталих, али могу да кажем да сам од оних који прате сасвим довољно да могу да уоче свесно формулисане подвале у формулацијама наслова и тумачењу званичних саопштења, или погрешне закључке надобудних антиваксера.”
Onda si trebao da uocis i da nešto nije uredu sa kuronom i preteranim bockanjem
+1 / -3
-2
Zorrko
09. jun 2023. u 20.11
-------
D-Man
(Analyst)
09. jun 2023. u 14.38
Аутору ове теме не вреди ништа рећи. Пјер га лепо поклопи и пита зашто није пренео целу информацију а он каже Пјеру да он може и даље да настави да гура главу у песак!!! Шта да човек каже на такве речи?
--------
ma da, trebalo bi prenositi svaki put beskrajne plahte teksta, sve da neki mudroser i brnjicar ne bi slučajno nešto zakerao. A mudroseri i ionako 90% (SKRACENIH) priloga preskoce, da ne bi slučajno trebali koristiti mozak.
Zašto Pjer nije analizarao i ostala 3 posta? Bilo mu teško vaditi glavu iz pijeska?
Ali kad me već vuces za jezik:
taj veci mortalitet kod nevakcinisanih je zbog toga sto neki koji su bili u teskom stadiju karcinoma ili dijabetesa i slično, nisu smjeli biti vakcinisani, jer bi ih ocito vakcina instantno ubila.
dakle, takve, koji su već ionako uglavnom bili na samrti, pa zbog toga i nisu vakcinisani, sad prikazuju kao dokaz da je kod nevakcinisanih veci mortalitet od kovida...
ali to je teško za shvatiti, kad ti je IQ u rangu 70-90, jel tako DMan?
treba mozak ukljuciti?
+1 / -3
-2
Zorrko
09. jun 2023. u 20.33
genijalac Dman, ni na jednu cinjenicu nema odgovor, nego navodi neku anegdotalnu pricu o nekom njegovom poznaniku koji je umro od srca, ali eto i prije je bolovao od srca pa je to normalno. I šta bi ja na to rekao ili ne bi...
Ono sto jDMan namjerno i licemjerno preskace, je to da je u u zadnje 2 godine zabiljezen značajni porast srcanih oboljenja (pogotovo kod mladjih ljudi), porast smrtnosti novoredjencadi, porast menstrualnih problema i neplodnosti kod žena, porast karcinoma itd.itd.
Dakle, zabrinjavajuci porast.
Što ne znači da su svi umrli, kako bi DMan želio protumaciti ozbiljna upozorenja na te dokazane pojave...
Ali, za sad sve to nije zakacilo DManovu guzicu, pa ga bas briga sto su mnogi drugi nastradali, pogotovo mladi.
Bitno je jedino da je njegova guzica ZA SAD u redu.
Za druge, šta ga briga?
Ko ih ebe, nisu imali sreće !
Empatija je to !!!!
+1 / -3
-2
Zorrko
09. jun 2023. u 20.41
-----
Zorrko
09. jun 2023. u 20.33
genijalac Dman, ni na jednu cinjenicu nema odgovor, nego navodi neku anegdotalnu pricu o nekom njegovom poznaniku koji je umro od srca,
-------
čak nije ni poznanik, nego neki rodjak od kolege na poslu... od strinine babe tetak...
A Dman je sve to strucno raspravio sa ženama u brijacnici, pa sad nama veleumno prikazuje kao naučnu cinjenicu?
Koji lik...
nit' pameti, nit' srama...
+1 / -3
-2
Zorrko
09. jun 2023. u 20.52
Vaskularna i organska oštećenja izazvana mRNA vakcinama: neoboriv dokaz uzročnosti
https://tinyurl.com/5n7v4rut
S obzirom da neki mudroseri zakeraju da nije prenesen cijeli tekst, evo im ga (sigurno će ga procitati sa razumijevanjem):
Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality
In Depth Popular Science
More
Michael Palmer, MD and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD
doctors4covidethics.org
Spanish Translation:
Daño vascular y de órganos inducido por vacunas de ARNm: Prueba irrefutable de causalidad
This article summarizes evidence from experimental studies and from autopsies of patients deceased after vaccination. The collective findings demonstrate that
mRNA vaccines don’t stay at the injection site by instead travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs,
mRNA-based COVID vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs,
vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation,
vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcome.
We note that the damage mechanism is which emerges from the autopsy studies is not limited to COVID-19 vaccines only but is completely general—it must be expected to occur similarly with mRNA vaccines against any and all infectious pathogens. This technology has failed and must be abandoned.
While clinical case reports (e.g. [1,2]) and statistical analyses of accumulated adverse event reports (e.g. [3,4]) provide valuable evidence of damage induced by mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, it is important to establish a causal relationship in individual cases. Pathology remains the gold standard for proof of disease causation. This short paper will discuss some key findings on autopsy materials from patients who died within days to several months after vaccination. For context, some experimental studies are briefly discussed as well.
1. Most of the evidence presented here is from the work of pathologist Prof. Arne Burkhardt, MD
Dr. Burkhardt was approached by the families of patients deceased after „vaccination”
Autopsy materials were examined by standard histopathology and immunohistochemistry
Based on the findings, most deaths were attributed to „vaccination” with a high to very high degree of likelihood
Prof. Burkhardt is a very experienced pathologist from Reutlingen, Germany. With the help of his colleague Prof. Walter Lang, he has studied numerous cases of death which occurred within days to several months after vaccination. In each of these cases, the cause of death had been certified as „natural” or „unknown.” Burkhardt became involved only because the bereaved families doubted these verdicts and sought a second opinion. It is remarkable, therefore, that Burkhardt found not just a few but the majority of these deaths to be due to vaccination.
While all four major manufacturers of gene-based vaccines were represented in the sample of patients studied by Burkhardt and Lang, most patients had received an mRNA vaccine from either Pfizer or Moderna. Some of the deceased patients had received both mRNA- and viral vector-based vaccines on separate occasions.
2. Pfizer’s own animal experiments show that the vaccine quickly distributes throughout the body
In order to cause potentially lethal damage, the mRNA vaccines must first distribute from the injection site to other organs. That such distribution occurs is apparent from animal experiments reported by Pfizer to Japanese authorities with its application for vaccine approval in that country [5]. Rats were injected intramuscularly with a radioactively labelled model mRNA vaccine, and the movement of the radiolabel first into the bloodstream and subsequently into various organs was followed for up to 48 hours.
The first thing to note is that the labelled vaccine shows up in the blood plasma after a very short time—within only a quarter of an hour. The plasma level peaks two hours after the injection. As it drops off, the model vaccine accumulates in several other organs. The fastest and highest rise is observed in the liver and the spleen. Very high uptake is also observed with the ovaries and the adrenal glands. Other organs (including the testes) take up significantly lower levels of the model vaccine. We note, however, that at least the blood vessels will be exposed and affected in every organ and in every tissue.
The rapid and widespread distribution of the model vaccine implies that we must expect expression of the spike protein throughout the body. For a more in-depth discussion of this biodistribution study, see Palmer2021b.
+1 / -3
-2
Zorrko
09. jun 2023. u 20.53
3. Expression of viral proteins can be detected with immunohistochemistry
While the distribution of the model vaccine leads us to expect widespread expression of the spike protein, we are here after solid proof. Such proof can be obtained using immunohistochemistry, which method is illustrated in this slide for the vaccine-encoded spike protein.
If a vaccine particle—composed of the spike-encoding mRNA, coated with lipids—enters a body cell, this will cause the spike protein to be synthesized within the cell and then taken to the cell surface. There, it can be recognized by a spike-specific antibody. After washing the tissue specimen to remove unbound antibody molecules, the bound ones can be detected with a secondary antibody that is coupled with some enzyme, often horseradish peroxidase. After another washing step, the specimen is incubated with a water-soluble precursor dye that is converted by the enzyme to an insoluble brown pigment. Each enzyme molecule can rapidly convert a large number of dye molecules, which greatly amplifies the signal.
At the top right of the image, you can see two cells which were exposed to the Pfizer vaccine and then subjected to the protocol outlined above. The intense brown stain indicates that the cells were indeed producing the spike protein.
In short, wherever the brown pigment is deposited, the original antigen—in this example, the spike protein—must have been present. Immunohistochemistry is widely used not only in clinical pathology but also in research; it could readily have been used to detect widespread expression of spike protein in animal trials during preclinical development. However, it appears that the FDA and other regulators never received or demanded such experimental data [6].
4. Expression of spike protein in shoulder muscle after vaccine injection
This slide (by Dr. Burkhardt) shows deltoid muscle fibres in cross section. Several (but not all) of the fibres show strong brown pigmentation, again indicating spike protein expression.
While the expression of spike protein near the injection site is of course expected and highly suggestive, we would like to make certain that such expression is indeed caused by the vaccine and not by a concomitant infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This is particularly important with respect to other tissues and organs which are located far away from the injection site.
5. Coronavirus particles contain two prominent proteins: spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N)
To distinguish between infection and injection, we can again use immunohistochemistry, but this time apply it to another SARS-CoV-2 protein—namely, the nucleocapsid, which is found inside the virus particle, where it enwraps and protects the RNA genome. The rationale of this experiment is simple: cells infected with the virus will express all viral proteins, including the spike and the nucleocapsid. In contrast, the mRNA-based COVID vaccines (as well as the adenovirus vector-based ones produced by AstraZeneca and Janssen) will induce expression only of spike.
6. Infected persons express the nucleocapsid protein (and also the spike protein)
This slide simply illustrates that the method works: lung tissue or cells from a nasal swab of a person infected with SARS-CoV-2 stain positive for nucleocapsid expression, whereas cultured cells exposed to the vaccine do not (but they stain strongly positive for the spike protein; see inset at the top right of Slide 3).
7. Injected persons express only the spike protein, which implicates the vaccine
Here, we see immunohistochemistry applied to heart muscle tissue from an injected person. Staining for the presence of spike protein causes strong brown pigment deposition. In contrast, only very weak, non-specific staining is observed with the antibody that recognizes the nucleocapsid protein. The absence of nucleocapsid indicates that the expression of the spike protein must be attributed ot the vaccine rather than an infection with SARS-CoV-2.
We will see shortly that the strong expression of spike protein in heart muscle after vaccination correlates with significant inflammation and tissue destruction.
8. Expression of spike protein within the walls of small blood vessels
We see spike protein expression in arterioles (small arteries; left) as well as in venules (small veins) and capillaries (right). Expression is most prominent in the innermost cell layer, the endothelium. This makes the endothelial cells „sitting ducks” for an attack by the immune system.
9. Endothelial stripping and destruction of a small blood vessel after vaccination
We now turn to the evidence of immune attack on the endothelial cells which produce the spike protein. On the left, a normal venule, delimited by an intact endothelium and containing some red blood cells and few white blood cells (stained blue) inside.
The image on at the centre shows a venule that is being attacked and destroyed by the immune system. The outline is already dissolving, and the spindle-shaped (and swollen) endothelial cells have peeled off from the vessel wall. Furthermore, we see lymphocytes—the small cells with dark, round nuclei and with very little cytoplasm around them; a single lymphocyte (at much higher magnification) is shown on the right.
Lymphocytes are the backbone of the specific immune system—whenever antigens are recognized and antibodies are produced, this is done by lymphocytes. Also among the lymphocytes we find cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells, which serve to kill virus-infected cells—or ones that look to them as if infected, because they have been forced to produce a viral protein by a so-called vaccine.
A crucial function of the endothelium is to prevent blood clotting. Thus, if the endothelium is damaged, as it is in this picture, and the tissues beyond it make contact with the blood, this will automatically set off blood clotting.
10. A crack in the wall of the aorta, lined by clusters of lymphocytes, leading to aortic rupture
On the left, a section through the wall of an aorta. This picture is taken at an even lower magnification than the one before; the lymphocytes now appear as just a cloud of tiny blue specks. To the left of this blue cloud, we see a vertical crack running through the tissue. Such a crack is also visible macroscopically in the excised specimen of an aorta shown on the right.
The aorta is the largest blood vessel of the body. It receives the highly pressurized blood ejected by the left ventricle of the heart, and it is thus exposed to intense mechanical stress. If the wall of the aorta is weakened by inflammation, as it is here, then it may crack and rupture. Aortic rupture is normally quite rare, but Prof. Burkhardt found multiple cases in his limited number of autopsies. Some of the affected aortas were also shown to have expressed the spike protein.
+1 / -2
-1
Zorrko
09. jun 2023. u 20.54
11. Healthy heart muscle tissue, and lymphocytic myocarditis
In Slide 7, we saw that heart muscle cells strongly expressed the spike protein after vaccine injection. Here, we see the consequences. The picture on the shows a sample of healthy heart muscle tissue, with regularly oriented and aligned heart muscle fibres. On the right, we see a heart muscle sample from one of the autopsies. The muscle fibres are disjointed and disintegrating, and they are surrounded by invading lymphocytes. Burkhardt found myocarditis in multiple of his deceased patients.
12. Lymphocytic infiltration and proliferative inflammation in lung tissue
On the left, we see healthy lung tissue, with air-filled spaces (the alveoli), delimited by delicate alveolar septa with embedded, blood-filled capillaries. We also see some larger blood vessels.
On the right hand side, we see lung tissue overrun by lymphocytes. The air-filled spaces have largely disappeared and been filled with scar (connective) tissue. This vaccine-injected patient would obviously have had very great trouble breathing.
Lymphocytic infiltration, inflammation and destruction were also observed in many other organs, including the brain, the liver, the spleen, and multiple glands. However, instead of illustrating them all, we will conclude the pathological evidence with another immunohistochemistry result, which strikingly shows the long duration of spike protein expression.
13. Vaccine-induced expression of spike protein in a bronchial biopsy nine months after vaccination
The slide shows a sample of bronchial mucous membrane, from a patient who is alive but has suffered respiratory symptoms ever since being vaccinated. We see several cells in the uppermost cell layer that strongly express spike protein—and this even nine months after his most recent vaccine injection! While this is indeed the most extreme case of long-lasting expression, there is evidence both from Burkhardt’s autopsies and from published studies on blood samples [7] or lymph node biopsies [8] to indicate that expression does last several months.
14. The Pfizer vaccine mRNA gets copied („reverse-transcribed”) into DNA and inserted into the cellular genome
The official mRNA vaccine narrative maintains that the modified mRNA contained in the vaccine will not be replicated in vivo; expression of the spike protein should therefore cease once the injected RNA molecules have been degraded.
The limited experimental studies available [9,10] suggest that the injected modified mRNA should be degraded within days to a few weeks of the injection. This is obviously difficult to square with the observed long-lasting expression; in some form or other, the genetic information appears to be perpetuated in vivo.
A recent experimental study from Sweden [11] has shown that human-derived cells can copy the Pfizer mRNA vaccine into DNA and then insert it into their own chromosomal DNA. The image shows the key evidence from this study. The cells were exposed to the vaccine for the lengths of time indicated. Cellular DNA was then isolated, and inserted DNA copies of the vaccine mRNA detected by PCR amplification of a fragment 444 base pairs (bp) in length.
All samples labelled with „BNT” had been treated with the vaccine, and they all show a PCR product of the expected length, as is evident from comparison to a DNA fragment length standard („L”). Samples labelled with „Ctrl n” were controls: Ctrl 1– 4 contained DNA from cells not incubated with vaccine, Ctrl 5 contained RNA (not DNA) from vaccine-treated cells; Ctrl 6 contained the same but was additionally treated with RNAse, which step was also performed in the purification of DNA samples. As expected, none of the control samples contain the PCR product.
Considering Aldén’s observation of DNA insertion in every single experimental sample, it seems highly likely that this will also occur in vivo. Beyond providing a plausible mechanism for perpetuating the expression of spike protein, DNA insertion also poses risks of genetic damage, leading to cancers and leukemias.
15. Summary
The evidence presented here clearly demonstrates a chain of causation from vaccine injection to
rapid distribution of the vaccine through the bloodstream,
widespread spike protein expression, prominently in blood vessels, and
autoimmune-like inflammation and organ damage.
Vaccine-induced vascular damage will promote blood clotting, and clotting-related diseases such as heart attack, stroke, lung embolism are very common in the adverse events databases [4,12].
In addition to autoimmune-like inflammation, other disease mechanisms, including prion-mediated CNS degeneration [13], aberrant vascular protein deposition (amyloidosis) [14,15], and lipid nanoparticle toxicity [16], are plausible but require further study and corroboration. Overall, these vaccines can no longer be considered experimental—the „experiment” has resulted in the disaster that many medical doctors and scientists predicted from the outset [17]. The vaccination must be stopped, and all approvals and authorizations of their use must be revoked.
References
Bozkurt, B. et al. (2021) Myocarditis With COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. Circulation 144:471-484
Ehrlich, P. et al. (2021) Biopsy-proven lymphocytic myocarditis following first mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in a 40-year-old male: case report. Clinical research in cardiology official journal of the German Cardiac Society 110:1855-1859
Rose, J. and McCullough, P.A. (2021) A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products. Current problems in cardiology p. 101011
Shilhavy, B. (2022) 43,898 Dead, 4,190,493 Injured Following COVID Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions.
Anonymous, (2020) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048) 2.6.4 Summary statement of the pharmacokinetic study [English translation].
Latyopva, A. (2022) Did Pfizer Perform Adequate Safety Testing for its Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine in Preclinical Studies? Evidence of Scientific and Regulatory Fraud.
Bansal, S. et al. (2021) Cutting Edge: Circulating Exosomes with COVID Spike Protein Are Induced by BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) Vaccination prior to Development of Antibodies: A Novel Mechanism for Immune Activation by mRNA Vaccines. J. Immunol. 207:2405-2410
Röltgen, K. et al. (2022) Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Cell (preprint)
Andries, O. et al. (2015) N1-methylpseudouridine-incorporated mRNA outperforms pseudouridine-incorporated mRNA by providing enhanced protein expression and reduced immunogenicity in mammalian cell lines and mice. J. Control. Release 217:337-344
Pardi, N. et al. (2018) Nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines induce potent T follicular helper and germinal center B cell responses. J. Exp. Med. 215:1571-1588
Aldén, M. et al. (2022) Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 44:1115-1126
Anonymous, (2021) OpenVAERS.
Perez, J.C. et al. (2022) Towards the emergence of a new form of the neurodegenerative Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Twenty six cases of CJD declared a few days after a COVID-19 „vaccine” Jab. ResearchGate (preprint)
Charnley, M. et al. (2022) Neurotoxic amyloidogenic peptides in the proteome of SARS-COV2: potential implications for neurological symptoms in COVID-19. Nat. Commun. 13:3387
Nyström, S. and Hammarström, P. (2022) Amyloidogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144:8945-8950
Palmer, M. and Bhakdi, S. (2021) The Pfizer mRNA vaccine: Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity.
Bhakdi, S. et al. (2021) Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns.
+1 / -2
-1
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
09. jun 2023. u 23.12
Zorrko.
>’dakle, takve, koji su već ionako uglavnom bili na samrti, pa zbog toga i nisu vakcinisani, sad prikazuju kao dokaz da je kod nevakcinisanih veci mortalitet od kovida...’
- - -
По теби су на самрти и они који би умрли за недељу дана, као и они који би умрли у року од годину, две, пет година, јер болују од коморбидитета, па их не треба убрајати у жртве Ковида, премда је Ковид био непосредни узрок, или допринео њиховој смрти.
Ти из така и без увида у њихове здравствене податке знаш да би они умрли баш тада, као што из така, опет без детаљнијег увида у стање сваког пацијента, знаш да је узрок изненадних смртних случајева била вакцина.
То што неки нису смели да буду вакцинисани, а однео их Ковид не мења ствар – ни у том случају не можеш да тврдиш колико би они још живели да нису оболели од Ковида.
***
>’taj veci mortalitet kod nevakcinisanih je zbog toga sto neki koji su bili u teskom stadiju karcinoma ili dijabetesa i slično, nisu smjeli biti vakcinisani, jer bi ih ocito vakcina instantno ubila.’
- - -
Значи, иако је непосредни узрок био Ковид, њих није требало сврстати у групу жртава Ковида ?
Болан у главу, укључи тај твој мозак од 3 грама - ако би их 'ocito vakcina instantno ubila’, Ковид би их убио још инстантније.
***
>’Ono sto jDMan namjerno i licemjerno preskace, je to da je u u zadnje 2 godine zabiljezen značajni porast srcanih oboljenja (pogotovo kod mladjih ljudi), porast smrtnosti novoredjencadi, porast menstrualnih problema i neplodnosti kod žena, porast karcinoma itd.itd.’
- - -
Да видимо какве нетачне вести пабирчиш и шириш, а другима пребацујеш недостатак емпатије.
SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project
November 9, 2022
≫
There is no link between COVID-19 vaccination and an increased risk of stillbirth, despite such claims online. In fact, vaccination has been shown in multiple studies to reduce the risk of stillbirth by protecting pregnant people and their babies from the coronavirus.
Numerous studies evaluating the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant people have found no increased risk of stillbirth among those who have been vaccinated. Far from demonstrating a safety hazard, vaccination has been shown to reduce a variety of coronavirus-related risks during pregnancy, including stillbirth.
Despite the robust safety findings, online posts have been circulating a „leaked” memo from a Fresno, California, hospital to incorrectly suggest that COVID-19 vaccination increases the risk of stillbirth.
„Leaked Hospital Email Reveals Explosion of Stillbirths Following COVID Vaccine Rollout,” reads one headline from the conspiracy theory website InfoWars, which was shared on Instagram.
The claim appears to originate with an Oct. 24 story in the Epoch Times, a far-right outlet affiliated with the Chinese spiritual movement Falun Gong. The site is frequently a source of misinformation, including on COVID-19 and vaccines.
According to the Epoch Times story, a staff member at a FRESNO HOSPITAL claimed that the stillbirth rate had „skyrocketed” after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. The employee shared an email from a managing nurse on Sept. 8 that referred to an apparent uptick in the number of „demise patients” occurring across the hospital system, including 22 demises in August, which tied the record in July 2021.
But the memo makes no mention of COVID-19 vaccination and is primarily focused on informing nursing staff how to properly handle the demise specimens. Moreover, the email never states that its figures are only for stillbirths.
Fetal death, or fetal demise, refers to death at any time in pregnancy. Deaths before 20 weeks of gestation are miscarriages, while deaths after 20 weeks (or sometimes 28 weeks) are considered stillbirths. Conflating stillbirth with fetal death erroneously exaggerates the number of stillbirths.
The public health departments of Fresno County and California also told us there has not been a significant increase in the stillbirth rate since the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines.
Citing Dr. James Thorp, a Florida gynecologist who has spread misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccines before, the Epoch Times proceeded to then falsely claim that the memo was „consistent” with other vaccine safety monitoring data in showing that the vaccines are hazardous during pregnancy.
That’s incorrect. The memo doesn’t implicate the COVID-19 vaccines, nor does the existing evidence suggest that vaccination is unsafe for pregnant people and their fetuses. On the contrary, vaccination can protect against COVID-19, which can be particularly dangerous for pregnant people and raise the risk of pregnancy complications, including stillbirth.
(следи наставак...)
+1 / -1
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
09. jun 2023. u 23.18
COVID-19 Vaccination Can Protect Against Stillbirth
According to a regularly updated online explainer by Victoria Male, a lecturer in reproductive immunology at Imperial College London, 16 studies have assessed COVID-19 vaccination safety with respect to stillbirth, and none has found an increased risk of stillbirth following COVID-19 vaccination.
A meta-analysis reviewing some of those studies, the explainer notes, „found that COVID vaccination actually reduces the risk of stillbirth,” likely because of the risk posed by coronavirus infection. The meta-analysis, published in Nature Communications in May, found the „risk of stillbirth was significantly lower in the vaccinated cohort by 15%.”
Dr. Brenna Hughes, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at Duke University Health System who has studied COVID-19 during pregnancy, also directed us to a study published this month in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology that found vaccinated women in Australia were about 80% less likely to experience a stillbirth compared with unvaccinated women. Hughes told us the claims in the posts were „quite false.”
Numerous studies have found that pregnant people who get infected with the coronavirus, or SARS-CoV-2, have a higher risk of stillbirth and other bad outcomes for both the mother and the baby than those who do not get infected.
…
+1 / -2
-1
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
09. jun 2023. u 23.21
Public Health Communications
November 02, 2022
Viral video claims COVID-19 vaccines are increasing stillbirths
A widely shared video clip claims that a hospital in southern California has seen an increase in stillbirths since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. A large social media account shared the video, which was viewed hundreds of thousands of times.
Multiple large studies have shown that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy does not increase the risk of miscarriage or stillbirth. Stillbirths rose dramatically in 2020, months before COVID-19 vaccines were available. This increase was likely at least partially due to COVID-19 infections, which increase the risk of several pregnancy complications, including stillbirth.
+1 / -2
-1
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
09. jun 2023. u 23.43
July 14, 2022
CDC and Medical Professionals Recommend COVID-19 Vaccination for People Who Want to Have Children
• There is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems (problems trying to get pregnant) in women or men.
• COVID-19 can make you very sick during pregnancy. Additionally, if you have COVID-19 during pregnancy, you are at increased risk of complications that can affect your pregnancy and developing baby.
NO EVIDENCE THAT COVID-19 VACCINES AFFECT FERTILITY
There is currently no evidence that vaccine ingredients or antibodies made following COVID-19 vaccination would cause any problems with becoming pregnant now or in the future.
• Recent studies have found no differences in pregnancy success rates among women who had antibodies from COVID-19 vaccines or from a recent COVID-19 infection, and women who had no antibodies, including for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology procedures (e.g., in vitro fertilization).11-13
• A study of more than 2,000 females aged 21-45 years and their partners found that COVID-19 vaccination of either partner did not affect the likelihood of becoming pregnant.14
Like with all vaccines, scientists continue to study COVID-19 vaccines carefully and will continue to report findings as they become available.
Limited, Temporary Impact of COVID-19 Vaccines on Menstrual Cycles
RESEARCH STUDIES OF FERTILITY IN HEALTHY MEN
• Currently, no evidence shows that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause male fertility problems. A recent small study of 45 healthy men who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine looked at sperm characteristics, like quantity and movement, before and after vaccination. Researchers found no significant changes in these sperm characteristics after vaccination.17
o However, one study found that COVID-19 infection may be associated with a decline in fertility for men for up to 60 days after infection.14
- - -
Чак ни прележани Ковид не изазива трајну неплодност код мушкараца.
+1 / -2
-1
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 00.38
1. mRNA vaccines don’t stay at the injection site by instead travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs,
- - -
Наравно да не стоји на месту убода.
Ако вакцина не стоји на месту убода, како онда на месту убода изазива магнетске ефекте ?
***
2. mRNA-based COVID vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs,
- - -
Колико шиљака протеина има намножени вирус SARS-CoV-2 у организму особе заражене Ковидом ?
Колико дуготрајне трагове оставља намножени вирус SARS-CoV-2 код заражене/оболеле особе ?
***
3. vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation,
- - -
А такве реакције уопште, ни случајно не изазива намножени вирус SARS-CoV-2 код заражене особе ?
***
4. vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcome.
- - -
Може, али не мора.
Колико је таквих случајева евидентирано у односу на број примењених доза вакцина, рецимо на 1 000, или 10 000 вакцинисаних ?
Каква оштећења органа може да узрокује намножени вирус SARS-CoV-2 код заражене особе ?
П.С. Зоррко каже да респираторни вирус(и) не могу да оштете друге органе.
+1 / -2
-1
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 00.49
zoxthegreat,
>'Onda si trebao da uocis i da nešto nije uredu sa kuronom i preteranim bockanjem'
- - -
Шта то nešto није у реду са kuronom ?
Кад већ тако добро уочаваш, наведи где сам икога наговарао, или подржавао претерано боцкање ?
+0 / -2
-2
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 12.11
pazi datum:
----------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
09. jun 2023. u 23.43
July 14, 2022
CDC and Medical Professionals Recommend COVID-19 Vaccination for People Who Want to Have Children
-------------
inače, Jocko je svojedobno CDC proglasio sumnjivim sajtom koji siri neprovjerene informacije.
Ovaj doktor ga podržava u tome:
---------------
Kevin Bass PhD MS:
Mislio sam da je ovo photoshop. Ali ne. Ovo je novi direktor CDC-a
https://tinyurl.com/98dety3h
-----------
+0 / -2
-2
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 12.20
-------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
09. jun 2023. u 23.12
- - -
По теби су на самрти и они који би умрли за недељу дана, као и они који би умрли у року од годину, две, пет година, јер болују од коморбидитета, па их не треба убрајати у жртве Ковида,
--------
naravno, šta je tu cudno?
Covjek umire od karcionoma, ali kovid je uzrok smrti?
--------
То што неки нису смели да буду вакцинисани, а однео их Ковид не мења ствар – ни у том случају не можеш да тврдиш колико би они још живели да нису оболели од Ковида.
***
-----------
ljudi već bili na samrti, a odnio ih kovid?
Vrlo logicno - ali ako ti je iQ u rangu 70-90.
- - -----
Значи, иако је непосредни узрок био Ковид, њих није требало сврстати у групу жртава Ковида ?
--------------
ljudi već bili na samrti, a odnio ih kovid?
Vrlo logicno - ali ako ti je iQ u rangu 70-90.
------
Болан у главу, укључи тај твој мозак од 3 грама - ако би их 'ocito vakcina instantno ubila’, Ковид би их убио још инстантније.
------
da se vratimo na početak:
92 posto umrlih od kovida 2022. je primilo 3 doze
Zorrko
08. jun 2023. u 19.55
Nova državna statistika otkrila je da je nevjerovatnih 92 posto ljudi koji su umrli od Covida 2022. godine imalo najmanje tri doze vakcina
Sjećate li se kada su govorili „ako ste vakcinisani, nećete dobiti Covid, niti ćete umrijeti od Covida”?
https://tinyurl.com/3wajn828
+0 / -2
-2
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 12.25
-------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 00.38
Колико дуготрајне трагове оставља намножени вирус SARS-CoV-2 код заражене/оболеле особе ?
-------
da ponovimo ono sto je odavno svima poznato:
u ogromnom broju slučajeva, zarazeni kovidom imaju blage ili nikakve simptome (tzv. slavni 'asimptomatski' slučajevi)
e sad... kod nekih kovidasa je ipak primjeceno da im je, zbog namnozenog virusa kovida - izrastao dugi nos...
eto, to su ti dugotrajni tragovi...
+0 / -2
-2
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 12.29
Studija: Ponovljena vakcinisanja protiv COVID-a slabe imunološki sistem
https://tinyurl.com/2jvcjm3d
+1 / -1
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 12.30
Zorrko,
>'inače, Jocko je svojedobno CDC proglasio sumnjivim sajtom koji siri neprovjerene informacije.'
- - -
Кад си већ упоран у лагању и фалсификовању, буди љубазан па цитирај цео контекст, да видимо шта сам прогласио сумњивим - да ли сам прогласио сумњивим сајтом CDC, или твоје манипулативно тумачење саопштења које је објавио CDC.
+1 / -1
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 12.30
Zorrko,
>'inače, Jocko je svojedobno CDC proglasio sumnjivim sajtom koji siri neprovjerene informacije.'
- - -
Кад си већ упоран у лагању и фалсификовању, буди љубазан па цитирај цео контекст, да видимо шта сам прогласио сумњивим - да ли сам прогласио сумњивим сајтом CDC, или твоје манипулативно тумачење саопштења које је објавио CDC.
+1 / -1
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 12.32
Не знам зашто је мој последњи коментар објављен двапут.
+1 / -2
-1
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 12.34
A Canadian Funeral Director Testifies at the National Citizen Inquiry About Healthcare Staff Falsifying a Man’s Cause of Death as
C O V I D on His Death Certificate
Inquiry Canada
https://fb.watch/l4nPxUc6LG/
+0 / -1
-1
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 12.38
------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 12.30
- - -
Кад си већ упоран у лагању и фалсификовању, буди љубазан па цитирај цео контекст,
------
----------------
------------------
---------------
Zorrko
06. septembar 2020. u 19.54
----------
Jocko4
(observer)
06. septembar 2020. u 14.03
Понавља се ширење „логичних” тумачења, које су објавили Јутјуб „стручњаци за сва питања овог света”.
Минери здравог разума из „поузданих извора” сазнају да је „samo 6% od onih koji se vode kao umrli od korone zaista i umrlo od korone.”
----------------
Link koji sam postavio, i na kojem se vide podaci je:
'The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a national public health institute in the United States. It is a United States federal agency, under the Department of Health and Human Services,[2] and is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.[3]'
Dakle americka federalna agencija u sklopu ministarstva zdravlja, a ne Јутјуб „стручњаци за сва питања овог света”.
+1 / -1
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 13.01
Zorrko,
>’ pazi datum:
----------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
09. jun 2023. u 23.43
July 14, 2022
CDC and Medical Professionals Recommend COVID-19 Vaccination for People Who Want to Have Children
- - -
Да, July 14, 2022
CDC and Medical Professionals Recommend COVID-19 Vaccination for People Who Want to Have Children
• There is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems (problems trying to get pregnant) in women or men.
…
Као и:
Јоцко4
09. jun 2023. u 23.21
Public Health Communications
November 02, 2022
Viral video claims COVID-19 vaccines are increasing stillbirths
A widely shared video clip claims that a hospital in southern California has seen an increase in stillbirths since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. A large social media account shared the video, which was viewed hundreds of thousands of times.
…
Датуми су потврда да ти у 2023. покушаваш да шириш објаве које су демантоване још 2022. Не би било чудно да то поново покушаш и 2024.
+1 / -1
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 13.20
Zorrko,
То што си навео НИЈЕ ЦЕО КОНТЕКСТ.
Наведи линк за тему (из 2020.) у којој смо дискутовали,
да може да се провери тачно шта је саопштено у линку CDC-a који си тамо поставио,
какво је било твоје тумачење
и на шта се односила моја примедба.
+1 / -1
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 13.28
Zorrko,
>'Link koji sam postavio, i na kojem se vide podaci je:
'The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a national public health institute in the United States. It is a United States federal agency, under the Department of Health and Human Services,[2] and is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.[3]' '
- - -
Ово није линк за обавештење о коме је реч, него декларација делатности CDC.
Наведи линк теме из 2020, јер се у њој налази линк за обавештење CDC-а.
+1 / -1
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 13.53
Zorrko,
>'naravno, šta je tu cudno?
Covjek umire od karcionoma, ali kovid je uzrok smrti?'
- - -
'Умирати' и 'умрети' не морају да имају исти узрок.
Човек болује од карцинома, а умре због срчаног удара.
Непосредан узрок смрти је - срчани удар.
Човек болује од дијабетеса, а погине у саобраћајном удесу.
Непосредан узрок смрти је - саобраћајни удес.
Човек има срчане проблеме, а настрада у пожару у кући.
Непосредан узрок смрти је - пожар у кући.
+1 / -0
+1
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 16.41
Zorrko,
>’ Studija: Ponovljena vakcinisanja protiv COVID-a slabe imunološki sistem
What was once deemed a conspiracy theory has turned into reality. And it’s leading to „life-threatening conditions such as cancer.”
...
- - -
Myth: The mRNA vaccines change your DNA and could cause cancer.
Truth: None of the vaccines interact with or alter your DNA in any way, and therefore cannot cause cancer.
Messenger RNA (mRNA) is not the same as DNA and cannot be combined with DNA to change your genetic code. Here’s now mRNA vaccines actually work:
The mRNA vaccines use a tiny piece of the coronavirus’ genetic code to teach your immune system how to make a protein that will trigger an immune response if you get infected. The mRNA is fragile and it delivers the instructions to your cells to make antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The mRNA does not enter the nucleus of the cell — the part that contains your DNA.
Therefore, there is no truth to the myth that somehow the mRNA vaccine could inactivate the genes that suppress tumors.
ИСТИНА: НИЈЕДНА ВАКЦИНА НИЈЕ У ИНТЕРАКЦИЈИ СА ВАШОМ ДНК НИТИ НА БИЛО КОЈИ НАЧИН МЕЊА НИ НА КОЈИ НАЧИН, ПА СТОГА НЕ МОЖЕ ИЗАЗВАТИ РАК.
Мессенгер РНА (мРНА) није исто што и ДНК и не може се комбиновати са ДНК да би се променио ваш генетски код. Ево шта мРНА вакцине заправо раде:
Вакцине мРНА користе мали део генетског кода коронавируса како би научили ваш имуни систем како да направи протеин који ће покренути имуни одговор ако се заразите. мРНАје крхка и даје упутства вашим ћелијама да направе антитела против САРС-ЦоВ-2. мРНА не улази у језгро ћелије - део који садржи вашу ДНК.
Стога, НЕМА ИСТИНЕ у миту да би мРНА вакцина на неки начин могла да инактивира гене који потискују туморе.
. . .
Myth: The death toll from COVID-19 is exaggerated. It includes people who were already sick with other conditions.
Truth: In a report from the CDC on deaths due to COVID-19, researchers found COVID-19 can directly and indirectly lead to mortality. People with underlying conditions like diabetes or obesity are at higher risk for contracting COVID-19 than those without preexisting conditions. It is true that a person’s preexisting condition may have contributed to their death from COVID-19. However, if the person had not contracted the virus, it is unlikely their preexisting condition would have led to their death. The death toll from COVID-19, in fact, is likely higher than what current numbers indicate. People who die from COVID-19 without being tested, for example, may not be included in current counts.
ИСТИНА: У ИЗВЕШТАЈУ CDC-а О СМРТИ ОД КОВИДа-19, ИСТРАЖИВАЧИ СУ ОТКРИЛИ ДА КОВИД-19 МОЖЕ ДИРЕКТНО И ИНДИРЕКТНО ДОВЕСТИ ДО СМРТНОСТИ. Људи са основним стањима као што су дијабетес или гојазност су под већим ризиком од заразе КОВИД-19 од оних без претходног стања. Истина је да је претходно стање неке особе могло допринети њиховој смрти од КОВИД-19. Међутим, да особа није заражена вирусом, мало је вероватно да би њено претходно стање (тада) довело до смрти. У СТВАРИ, БРОЈ СМРТНИХ СЛУЧАЈЕВА ОД ЦОВИД-19 ЈЕ ВЕРОВАТНО ВЕЋИ НЕГО ШТО ПОКАЗУЈУ ТРЕНУТНИ БРОЈЕВИ. ЉУДИ КОЈИ УМРУ ОД ЦОВИД-19 БЕЗ ТЕСТИРАЊА, НА ПРИМЕР, МОЖДА НЕЋЕ БИТИ УКЉУЧЕНИ У ТРЕНУТНИ БРОЈ.
https://www.mskcc.org/coronavirus/myths-about-covid-19-vaccines
+0 / -0
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 16.48
anonima,
Проблем је још замршенији, јер такви листови/интернет портали, као и таблоиди, доносе и понеке вести које нису из области теорија ЗАБЛУДЕ. Тако се ствара лажни утисак да су они објективни.
+1 / -1
0
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 19.11
-------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 13.20
Zorrko,
То што си навео НИЈЕ ЦЕО КОНТЕКСТ.
Наведи линк за тему (из 2020.) у којој смо дискутовали,
-------
ahahahhahah,
ma evo sve trcim da tebi lazljivom ispramozgasu, do u beskonacnost ponavljam tvoje vlastite budalastine, a da ti svaki put kad te se sa lakocom raskrinka, trazis siri 'kontekst'...
+1 / -1
0
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 19.14
--------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 13.53
- - -
'Умирати' и 'умрети' не морају да имају исти узрок.
Човек болује од карцинома, а умре због срчаног удара.
Непосредан узрок смрти је - срчани удар.
Човек болује од дијабетеса, а погине у саобраћајном удесу.
Непосредан узрок смрти је - саобраћајни удес.
Човек има срчане проблеме, а настрада у пожару у кући.
Непосредан узрок смрти је - пожар у кући.
--------
ne, to je nekad tako bilo.
danas, po novonormalno-ispranozgaskom, jedini uzrok je - smrtonosni virus prehlade !
Tako rekli 'autoriteti' !
+1 / -1
0
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 19.21
-----
anonima
(Stranac)
10. jun 2023. u 16.34
The Epoch Times, ekstremno desni list vezan sa novim religioznim pokretom Falun Gong. Jako ozbiljna studija, u rangu sa ozbiljnosti ravnozemljaskih studija
-------
naravno, ispranmozgaski brnjicar ne može se osvrnuti na cinjenice, niti logicno argumentirati, nego je njegov 'argument' na JEDAN OD NAVEDENIH izvora, da je to 'ekstremno desni list', 'ravnozemljasi' i bla, bla,bla...
riječ je o tipicnoj ekstremnoj gluposti ispranomozgasa...
ostale izvore i cinjenice čak ni ne spominje niti pokusava diskutirati, jer je to pretezak zadatak za njegov brnjicarski mozak.
Da, teško je to, trebalo bi pokusati razmišljati !
Puno je lakse papagajski ponavljati servirane propagandne etikete...
+1 / -1
0
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 19.27
-----
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 16.41
Myth:
------
ahahahaha, Jocko i dalje nastavlja 'argumentaciju' koristenjem fartcheckera...
a svakom sa imalo mozga je odavno jasno da su fartcheckeri propagandne platforme prilagodjene onima sa IQ-om u rangu 70-90, koje im nude 'strucne' odgovore, a sve sa ciljem da se ispranomozgasi i brnjicari ne moraju truditi da sami pokusaju kriticki razmišljati...
'njihovo' mišljenje im je već servirano...treba samo kopi-pejst, a toliko i sami znaju
+1 / -1
0
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 19.37
------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 12.32
Не знам зашто је мој последњи коментар објављен двапут.
--------
da se nisu možda odbjegli nikovi logirali i odlogirali nekoliko puta, pa se skripta zbunila?
😉
+1 / -1
0
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 19.47
-------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 16.48
anonima,
Проблем је још замршенији, јер такви листови/интернет портали, као и таблоиди, доносе и понеке вести које нису из области теорија ЗАБЛУДЕ. Тако се ствара лажни утисак да су они објективни.
--------
ma vidi ti samo našeg mudrog Jocka, kako on odjednom zna kako propaganda funkcionira...
Pretpostavljam da se ovaj Jockov komentar odnosi i na CDC, a kojeg je Jocko svojedobno proglasio youtube portalom koji samo prenosi glupost?
I valjda na ostale 'sluzbene' medije i fartcheckere, a na koje Jocko redovno odlazi da bi dobio novu porciju 'svog' mišljenja?
+0 / -1
-1
Zorrko
10. jun 2023. u 20.25
-----Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 16.48
доносе и понеке вести које нису из области теорија ЗАБЛУДЕ.
------
o teorijama zablude, srdacno si pozvan da pišes na ovoj temi:
https://www.serbiancafe.com/lat/diskusije/mesg/15/17484752/zuckerberg-facebook-se-izvinjava-zbog-cenzure.html?0
+0 / -0
0
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
10. jun 2023. u 22.52
Zorrko Ćorrko,
>’da se nisu možda odbjegli nikovi logirali i odlogirali nekoliko puta, pa se skripta zbunila?’
- - -
Можда у твојој глави скрипта ради на тај начин, да објављује дуплиране коментаре.
Провери, мој коментар је двапут објављен узастопно у исто време, 10. jun 2023. u 12.30, а само једном сам притиснуо дугме „Објави (кликните једанпут)”
***
>’ma evo sve trcim da tebi lazljivom ispramozgasu, do u beskonacnost ponavljam tvoje vlastite budalastine, a da ti svaki put kad te se sa lakocom raskrinka, trazis siri 'kontekst'...’
- - -
Ти с лакоћом једино умеш да лажеш и ништа друго.
***
>’ahahahaha, Jocko i dalje nastavlja 'argumentaciju' koristenjem fartcheckera...’
- - -
Што уздишеш тако болно ? Имаш неки респираторни проблем ?
Према свецу и тропар.
Fartcheckers су сасвим довољни за демантовање вести твојих TrrrtCvrrrcSources.
Нисам ја крив што ти преносиш већ демантоване информације. Да не бих траћио време пишући есеје поводом твојих умоболних коментара, довољно је да копирам и поставим њихов деманти.
***
>’danas, po novonormalno-ispranozgaskom, jedini uzrok je - smrtonosni virus prehlade!’
- - -
Како да не, одавно је познато да је вирус прехладе вишеструко смртоноснији од грипа. (По Зоррковом ново-нормалном).
+1 / -2
-1
Zorrko
11. jun 2023. u 12.19
------
anonima
(Stranac)
11. jun 2023. u 03.08
Zorrko, ja sam tri puta vakcinisan i pored svega sam prebolio kovid.
-------
dobre te vakcine, efikasne...
---------
Jednostavno si nisam postavljao to pitanje jer da je to istina, ja u takvom svijetu ne bih želio da živim.
--------
upravo tako, teško je razmišljati svojom glavom, lakse je prihvatiti šta ti 'autoriteti' kažu...
-------
Dakle, možda je bolje biti ovca koja vjeruje u čovječanstvo
--------
možda je tebi tako lakse, ali bolje nije sasvim sigurno. A ta tvoja vjera nije u covjecantsvo, nego u 'autoritete'. 'Autoriteti' nisu covjecanstvo, nego bas obratno - oni su opasnost za slobodu u prosperitet covjecanstva i humanizma
-----
I vezano za famozni skript koji duplicira javljanja … nije ti serbiancafe umjetna inteligencija da može nešto da je zbuni.
------
izgleda da tebi treba umjetna inteligencija, da bi shvatio salu...
+1 / -1
0
Zorrko
12. jun 2023. u 10.35
anonima, a da li si pokusao upotrebiti svoju vlastitu pamet?
ah, da: to je pretesko...
+0 / -1
-1
Zorrko
12. jun 2023. u 20.26
-----
anonima
(Stranac)
12. jun 2023. u 11.03
Ja prehranjujem porodicu svakodnevnom upotrebom sopstvene pameti
--------
tvoja silna pamet se vidi iz ovoga:
------
anonima
(Stranac)
11. jun 2023. u 03.08
Zorrko, ja sam tri puta vakcinisan i pored svega sam prebolio kovid.
-------
dakle, 3 puta bocnut spasonosnom vakcinom, a onda dobijes kovid?
A i dalje ništa ne kontas?
Ne znam, možda da uzmes i 4. bocku? Možda te ta zastiti?
Sve u svemu, u tvom slučaju, mislim da ti je bolje da slusas vudu vraceve i Milojka vidovnjaka.
Manja steta... ako ti i ne pomognu, barem ti neće odmoci...
iako, sumnjam da tebi iko može pomoći...
+0 / -1
-1
Zorrko
12. jun 2023. u 20.34
------
anonima
(Stranac)
12. jun 2023. u 11.03
Ako ti je stalo do zdravog razuma, izbjegavaj ekstreme, pogotovo ekstremnu desnicu.
--------
ekstremnu desnicu?
a to su svi oni koji ne slijede nametnuti suplji narativ, nego misle svojom glavom?
Ma da, ekstremna desnica, a šta bi drugo bilo?
A ispranomozgaski zombiji, koji i sami priznaju da su nesposobni razmišljati svojom glavom, su po nasem anonimnom - primjeri zdravog razuma...
🤣🤣🤣
a ne možda: primjeri ekstremne gluposti?
🙄
+1 / -1
0
Zorrko
13. jun 2023. u 10.46
------
anonima
(Stranac)
13. jun 2023. u 10.33
Dakle, bolest od koje su umrli milioni ljudi sirom svijeta je meni zadala probleme kao neka obična prehlada.
--------
broj umrlih od kovida globalno, u 3 godine trajanja 'smrtonosne' epidemije, je ispod nivoa statisticke greške...
a ogromna vecina zarazenih je imala blage ili nikakve simptome...
jer je ta 'smrtonosna' pandemija uvijek i bila - malo jača prehlada...
+0 / -1
-1
Zorrko
13. jun 2023. u 10.52
ispravak:
umjesto: 'broj umrlih od kovida globalno,'
je trebalo biti:
'postotak umrlih od kovida u globalnoj populaciji'
+0 / -1
-1
Zorrko
13. jun 2023. u 11.02
------
anonima
(Stranac)
13. jun 2023. u 10.33
Da su svi ljudi kao ti, mi bismo i dalje kremenom palili vatru, ako bi i za to bili sposobni.
-------
ma da, mracnjaci... a nego šta drugo?
i ekstremna desnica...
ah, sva sreća da imamo ispranomozgase da nam to 'strucno' objasne...
obrazovali ljudi se na fartcheckerima !
pa sad samopouzdano barataju 'znanjem'...
+0 / -1
-1
Zorrko
13. jun 2023. u 20.03
ispranomozgas anonima, sa IQ-om u rangu 70-90, sa sopstvenim priznanjem da ne koristi svoj mozak, nego iskljucivo slusa 'autoritete', se hvali 'obrazovanjem'...
a jedva se provukao kroz srednju skolu?
takvi 'intelektulaci' su mi najdrazi... ne previse inteligentni ali zato uporni, k'o volovi...
'autoriteti' im stave jaram, a oni samo vuku, vuku, vuku...
a mozak na pasu...
+1 / -1
0
Zorrko
13. jun 2023. u 20.09
uglavnom, za anonimu, koji je nesposoban samostalno procesirati cinjenice, i koji je, nakon što se 3 puta bocnuo 'spasoonosnim' vakcinama - dobio kovid, ali i ne dalje ne konta ništa,
da ponovimo:
------
92 posto umrlih od kovida 2022. je primilo 3 doze
Nova državna statistika otkrila je da je nevjerovatnih 92 posto ljudi koji su umrli od Covida 2022. godine imalo najmanje tri doze vakcina
Sjećate li se kada su govorili „ako ste vakcinisani, nećete dobiti Covid, niti ćete umrijeti od Covida”?
https://tinyurl.com/3wajn828
--------
Repetitio est mater studiorum !
+1 / -0
+1
Zorrko
14. jun 2023. u 19.53
------
anonima
(Stranac)
14. jun 2023. u 01.49
Nego, da mi ovo završimo starac, odoh ja popričati recimo sa digikodom na ulaznim vratima, zanimljivije će mi biti.
-------
apsolutno te podržavam...
to ti je, otprilike, i intelektialni kapacitet...
Looking for PomPom Keychains?
Izaberite državu:
Australija
Austrija
Bosna i Hercegovina
Crna Gora
Evropska Unija
Francuska
Holandija
Hrvatska
Kanada
Nemačka
Sjedinjene Američke Države (SAD)
Srbija
Švajcarska
Švedska
Velika Britanija
Latinica |
Ћирилица
|
English
© Trend Builder Inc. i saradnici. Sva prava zadržana.
Terms of use
-
Privacy policy
-
Marketing
.