-------
Teorija zavere ili konspiracionizam[2] je objašnjenje nekog događaja ili situacije uključivanjem zavere zlih i moćnih aktera, često sa političkom motivacijom,[3][4] iako su druga objašnjenja verovatnija.
-------

a ko to određuje šta je vjerovatnije? samozvani autoriteti? Ministarstvo istine?

-------
[5] Ovaj termin ima pežorativnu konotaciju i implicira da je pribegavanje zaveri zasnovano na predrasudama ili nedostatku dokaza.
--------

dakle termin ima pežorativnu konotaciju i implicira nešto? to onda u stvari znači da taj termin - ne znaci ništa.

------
[6] Teorije zavere su otporne na falsifikabilnost (opovrgljivost) i jačaju tu otpornost pomoću cirkularnog rezonovanja: dokazi protiv zavere, isto kao i odsustvo dokaza u njenu korist, tumače se kao dokazi njene istinitosti,[6][7] i samim tim, zavera postaje više stvar verovanja nego dokazivanja.
-----------

kako se mogu dokazi protiv zavjere koristiti u njenu korist?
Ocito da onda ti dokazi nisu nikakvi dokazi.

[8][9] Na psihološkom nivou, konspiracistička ideacija — verovanje u teorije zavere — može biti štetna ili patološka[10][11] i u velikom broju slučajeva korelira sa paranojom i makijavelizmom.
----------

ni manje ni vise, nego paranojom i makijavelizmom? u velikom broju slučajeva?

------
[12] Teorije zavere, koje su nekada bile ograničene na marginalnu publiku, postale su uobičajene u masovnim medijima i pojavljuju se kao kulturološki fenomen krajem 20. i početkom 21. veka.[13][14]
----------

znaci masovni mediji sire Teorije zavjere?

------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
27. februar 2023. u 16.20

Сугерисање већ припремљеног закључка; навођење претпостављеног, непровереног и/или недоказаног сценарија, а затим нуђење закључка као да је тај сценарио реално истинит и тачан.
------

kao onog da je kovid smrtonosna pandemija?
i da nas jedino mogu spasiti neustavna zatvaranja, brnjice, i spaosonosne vakcine koje ne stite od ničega ali mogu izazvati krvne ugruske i ko zna šta još?

------
На исти начин други могу да замисле било какав другачији сценарио и протурају закључке - по жељи.
---------

tako je i jocko predvidjao stotime miliona umrlih od kovida - po zelji.
Na sreću neki od nas imaju svoj mozak, pa odbacuju jockove suplje teorije...
A i cinjenice su vise nego jasne... osim Jocku...

------
Jocko4
(ɹǝʌɹǝsqo)
27. februar 2023. u 22.30

- - -

Јоцко никад није predvidjao stotime miliona umrlih od kovida .
Твоје гебелсовско понављање лажи је већ неколико пута проваљено.
-------

Pinokio, koliki ti je nos izrastao?

I mislis da svi to već ne vide? (osim onih koji ne žele vidjeti)

šta sansui i dankadubajic iz ontarija misle o tome?

California Doctor APOLOGIZES For Vax Injured Patients!

Feb 18, 2023 — Michael Huang, a doctor based in California, recently appeared on Fox News and issued an apology on behalf of the medical establishment over ...

https://tinyurl.com/2p8ajsdp

-----
Kraj_Sveta
(socijala)
01. mart 2023. u 19.41

Uostalom, da li se neko seca na početku pandemije da li je „nauka” pominjala da kovid prouzrukuje klotove i srcane probleme? Ja se ne secam, osim pluca jedino sam čuo da bubrezi mogu da stradaju.
-------

naravno da ne, to je sve naknadna „nauka”, nakon masovne 'spasonosne' vakcinacije.

nevjerovatno dokle neki mogu ići sa ociglednim lazima...

top 10 najvecih laži koje su ispričali stručnjaci za COVID - a sada su razotkriveni:
(Marty Makary MD, MPH is a professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and author of „The Price We Pay.”)

Misinformation #1:
Natural immunity offers little protection compared to vaccinated immunity
A Lancet study looked at 65 major studies in 19 countries on natural immunity. The researchers concluded that natural immunity was at least as effective as the primary COVID vaccine series.

vaccine
Public health officials downplayed concerns about vaccine-induced myocarditis — or inflammation of the heart muscle.
AP/Nathan Papes
In fact, the scientific data was there all along — from 160 studies, despite the findings of these studies violating Facebook’s „misinformation” policy.

Since the Athenian plague of 430 BC, it has been observed that those who recovered after infection were protected against severe disease if reinfected.

That was also the observation of nearly every practicing physician during the first 18 months of the COVID pandemic.

Most Americans who were fired for not having the COVID vaccine already had antibodies that effectively neutralized the virus, but they were antibodies that the government did not recognize.

Misinformation #2:
Masks prevent COVID transmission
Cochran Reviews are considered the most authoritative and independent assessment of the evidence in medicine.
And one published last month by a highly respected Oxford research team found that masks had no significant impact on COVID transmission.
When asked about this definitive review, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky downplayed it, arguing that it was flawed because it focused on randomized controlled studies.
A member of the New York Police Department (NYPD) receives a dose of the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine at Queens Police Academy in the Queens borough of New York, U.S., January 11, 2021.
A study recently found that masks didn’t have much of an effect on preventing COVID-19 transmission.
Jeenah Moon/Pool via REUTERS
But that was the greatest strength of the review! Randomized studies are considered the gold standard of medical evidence.
If all the energy used by public health officials to mask toddlers could have been channeled to reduce child obesity by encouraging outdoor activities, we would be better off.

Misinformation #3:
School closures reduce COVID transmission
The CDC ignored the European experience of keeping schools open, most without mask mandates.
Transmission rates were no different, evidenced by studies conducted in Spain and Sweden.

Misinformation #4:
Myocarditis from the vaccine is less common than from the infection
Public health officials downplayed concerns about vaccine-induced myocarditis — or inflammation of the heart muscle.

They cited poorly designed studies that under-captured complication rates.
A flurry of well-designed studies said the opposite.
We now know that myocarditis is six to 28 times more common after the COVID vaccine than after the infection among 16- to 24-year-old males.
Tens of thousands of children likely got myocarditis, mostly subclinical, from a COVID vaccine they did not need because they were entirely healthy or because they already had COVID.

Misinformation #5:
Young people benefit from a vaccine booster
Boosters reduced hospitalizations in older, high-risk Americans.
But the evidence was never there that they lower COVID mortality in young, healthy people.
That’s probably why the CDC chose not to publish its data on hospitalization rates among boosted Americans under 50, when it published the same rates for those over 50.
Ultimately, White House pressure to recommend boosters for all was so intense that the FDA’s two top vaccine experts left the agency in protest, writing scathing articles on how the data did not support boosters for young people.

A general view of a „face mask required” sign in the lobby of a salon in Hawthorne, NJ on February 16, 2022.
President Biden pushed extreme policies to attempt to get every American vaccinated.
Christopher Sadowski

Misinformation #6:
Vaccine mandates increased vaccination rates
President Biden and other officials demanded that unvaccinated workers, regardless of their risk or natural immunity, be fired.
They demanded that soldiers be dishonorably discharged and nurses be laid off in the middle of a staffing crisis.
The mandate was based on the theory that vaccination reduced transmission rates — a notion later proven to be false.

But after the broad recognition that vaccination does not reduce transmission, the mandates persisted, and still do to this day.
A recent study from George Mason University details how vaccine mandates in nine major US cities had no impact on vaccination rates.
They also had no impact on COVID transmission rates.

Misinformation #7:
COVID originating from the Wuhan lab is a conspiracy theory
Google admitted to suppressing searches of „lab leak” during the pandemic.

Dr. Francis Collins, head of the National Institutes of Health, claimed (and still does) he didn’t believe the virus came from a lab.

Ultimately, overwhelming circumstantial evidence points to a lab leak origin — the same origin suggested to Dr. Anthony Fauci by two very prominent virologists in a January 2020 meeting he assembled at the beginning of the pandemic.

According to documents obtained by Bret Baier of Fox News, they told Fauci and Collins that the virus may have been manipulated and originated in the lab, but then suddenly changed their tune in public comments days after meeting with the NIH officials.

The virologists were later awarded nearly $9 million from Fauci’s agency.

An aerial view shows the P4 laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China's central Hubei province on April 17, 2020.
The theory that COVID-19 originated from a Chinese lab in Wuhan proved to be true.

Misinformation #8:
It was important to get the second vaccine dose three or four weeks after the first dose
Data were clear in the spring of 2021, just months after the vaccine rollout, that spacing the vaccine out by three months reduces complication rates and increases immunity.

Spacing out vaccines would have also saved more lives when Americans were rationing a limited vaccine supply at the height of the epidemic.

Misinformation #9:
Data on the bivalent vaccine is ‘crystal clear’
Dr. Ashish Jha famously said this, despite the bivalent vaccine being approved using data from eight mice.

To date, there has never been a randomized controlled trial of the bivalent vaccine.

In my opinion, the data are crystal clear that young people should not get the bivalent vaccine.

It would have also spared many children myocarditis.

Misinformation #10:
One in five people get long COVID
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claims that 20% of COVID infections can result in long COVID.

But a UK study found that only 3% of COVID patients had residual symptoms lasting 12 weeks. What explains the disparity?

It’s often normal to experience mild fatigue or weakness for weeks after being sick and inactive and not eating well.

Calling these cases long COVID is the medicalization of ordinary life.

A picture of the covid-19 vaccine.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claims that 20% of COVID infections can result in long COVID, but other studies say differently.
MediaNews Group via Getty Images
What’s most amazing about all the misinformation conveyed by CDC and public health officials is that there have been no apologies for holding on to their recommendations for so long after the data became apparent that they were dead wrong.

Public health officials said „you must” when the correct answer should have been „we’re not sure.”

Early on, in the absence of good data, public health officials chose a path of stern paternalism.

Today, they are in denial of a mountain of strong studies showing that they were wrong.

A mea culpa by those who led us astray would be a first step to rebuilding trust.