Evo knjige :

http://www.archive.org/stream/whoareslavsacon02radogoog#page/n9/mode/2up

Tabanac, skrati priču. Po čemu je knjiga značajna? Vidim na početku piše o lošem poznavanju slovenske psihologije i rase u Americi početkom rata. Šta je BITNO u knjizi?

sizhe...ako je proslost bila romanska sadasnjost je germanska onda je buducnost namenjena Slavenima...

kao da sam već procitao to negdje...ovi prvi se vezuju za kulturu,drugi za organizaciju,tehnicki napredak a treci za duh ili dusu...i dostojevski je nešto slično pisao,,,ono sa starom i napustenom gradjevinom kojoj,na istoku, samo jedan cvijetak daje neki smisao postojanja i dusu dok je na zapadu ta ista gradjevina cista suprotnost ovoj sa istoka,ruglo koje zaudara.

„ako je proslost bila romanska sadasnjost je germanska onda je buducnost namenjena Slavenima”
------

Mogu da se složim sa ovim iz perspektive godine kada je knjiga napisana.

Sloveni su imali svoju budućnost - prvi čovek u svemiru je bio Sloven, Jurij Gagarin. Prbvi sateliti su bili slovenski, Varšavski pakt je bio najjači vojni pakt na svetu itd.

Ali ta budućnost je prošla. Nova budućnost pripada Kinezima i Indijcima, to govore svi pokazatelji, od demografskih do ekonomskih.

Sloveni su svoju šansu imali, a novu mogu da dobiju samo kao lideri Evrope na čelu sa Rusima i svima ostalima. U Evropi smo najbrojniji i to treba iskoristiti. Panslavizam je doživeo težak udarac raspadom SSSR-a, Čehosloačke i Jugoslavije. Kao što vidimo, tek sada se diže polako iz groba. Najveći bauk u Evropi je bauk panslavizma.I dalje. 300 miliona Slovena imaju težinu. Ali na globalnom planu šta je to naspram 2.5 milijardi Kinesa i Indijaca?

bravo „trag” tako bi to trebalo da izgleda... cista suprotnost sadasnjem

NEKO MALOPRE SPOMENU ,,ENGLESKU KRALJEVSKU LOZU VINDZOR,,...

1917. - Na talasu antinemačkih osećanja u Velikoj Britaniji tokom Prvog svetskog rata, britanska kraljevska kuća promenila je ime Saks-Koburg-Gota u Vindzor. Britanska kraljevska porodica je nemačkog porekla pa je tada njihovo zvanično prezime promenjeno, a uzeli su novo po nazivu kraljevske palate u blizini Londona.

Knjiga mi se svidja. Mislim da je pisac u pravu.
Pisac je veoma realistican.

Odlomak:

SINCE the World War began it is a daily fact that the
general public and many foreign authors are asking
eagerly and constantly, Who is the Slav? What is his in-
difoidualityt His mentality? His character? His soul?
His behavior? The fact is that they do not know the
Slav. Yes, he is almost unknown even to the science of
psychology, and yet it is a fact that for a serious student
of psychology of people there is no richer field of labor than
the character, soul, or mind of the Slav. All that we
have to-day in the psychology of the Slav are a few scat-
tered words of praise or condemnation of Slavic nature
by foreign travellers, historians, sociologists, anthropolo-
gists, philologists, statesmen, philosophers, and literary
writers.

The praising words come mainly from the French autors...
...

The words of condemnation come, with very few excep-
tions, entirely from the Germans, who from the days of
Charlemagne (742-814) reiterate the parrot-cry that the
Slavs do not show ability, that they are barbarians, or at
least semi-barbarians, and troglodyte — obstinate, danger-
ous, and ugly. Either that treatment is meted out to the
Slavs or else the Germans do not give them any considera-
tion at all. A German poet at the beginning of the nine-
teenth century, Friedrich M. von Klinger (1752-1831),
divides all people into two divisions: (I) men and (II)
Russians.
The Germans maintain the necessity of exter-
minating, if not all Slavs, at least the Poles, whom they con-
sider as culpable for not wishing to loše themselves in the
German stock, which is almost an identical case with the
Lusatian Serbs. Hegel does not think it necessary to men-
tion the Slav in his works. Theodor Mommsen asked the
Germans to break the skulls of the Czechs. Yes, this great
German scholar, with his intellectual superiority only makes
the venomous coarseness of his language more characteris-
tic when he says: „Czech skulls do not understand reason,
but they understand blows. It is a matter of fighting for
life and death.” (See his letter to his Austrian German
brothers published in autumn, 1897, in Neue Freie Presse
of Vienna.) Prince von Biilow calls the Poles an inferior
people to be trodden under foot. A. Penk, Profes-
sor of Geography at Vienna University, pronounced
many sarcastic words about the Slav before his Slavic stu-
dents.
Professor Friedrich Paulsen (1846-1908) of Ber-
lin University sarcastically mentions the ideals of the Slavs
in his philosophical writings. No doubt, it is much easier
to point out the mistakes in the life of a great mind of a
people than clearly and fully to unfold its worth. It is in-
teresting to note that a German congress made a resolu-
tion to wipe out the Czech people from the surface of the
globe — in the name of Kvltur. Professor Ernst Haeckel
(b. 1834) propagated a German nationalism according to
which it is most necessary to wipe out the Slavic tribes
(Serbs, Croats, etc.) from their Balkan lands. The Ger-
man professor of mathematics, Johann Frischauf, writes
about his colleague at the University at Gratz, Ed. Richter,
as follows: „Ed. Richter enjoyed fame at Gratz just be-
cause he expressed on every occasion his hatred against the
South Slavs, stating always that they are an inferior race.”
Treitschke's description of the Slav as a born slave is the
German notion of the Russian. „That immense colossus
with feet in clay,” he wrote in a passage which has a start-
ling contemporaneous bitterness and appositeness, „will
be absorbed in its domestic and economic difficulties,” and so
the „peace of the world” (*^., a German peace) will be in-
sured. These German writers claim earnestly that the only
chance of salvation for the Slav lies in the merging of his
identity with that of the German of the Empire.

Professor Srgjan Tucich in his recent work, The Slav
Nations, (New York, Doran, 1915, p. 198) says:

The German scholars made it their business to lay stress on
„Slav barbarism” wherever possible, to obscure the bright and
glorious pages in Slav history, and to emphasize everything that
can be taken as a proof of savagery and arrested development.
Unfortunately, no one has written at such length about the Slav
question, or attached so much importance to it, as the German
scholars, with the result that other European nations have de-
rived their view from them — so much so that one might almost
say that German opinion on the Slavs has become the opinion
of Europe. Constant unrest in Russia, and the consequent re*
prisals of the authorities afforded a welcome pretext for mis-
judging the Slavs, and the ordinary public of Europe came to
know of them only as medieval inquisitors with Siberia as their
great torture-chamber. No one seemed to realize that these revo-
lutionary movements, no less than the insurrections in other Slav
countries, merely represented the resistance of a virile people
craving enlightenment against autocratic barbarism, and that it
is obviously unfair to judge the Slavs by the deeds of their
oppressors, who in every case have followed the German methods
cultivated by their governments in most Slav countries, and im-
ported into Russia by Peter the Great. 1 On the other hand, if the
Slav nations are judged by the soul of the people and not by their
rulers and state-systems, they show a high standard of civilization
and a trend towards culture of a kindly, humanitarian type,
which promises to be a better contribution to Western European
progress than the much-advertised German Kultur (pp. 12-18).
. . • The abuse the Germans have heaped upon Russian bar-
barism is merely the outcome of envious rage on the part of an
inferior who sees his artificial pseudo-culture endangered by an-
other culture which blossoms from the depths of the human
heart (p. 34).

Dostoyevsky, who knew best the Vdme msse, proudly
looked for the symptoms of the world-intelligence in his own
nation. He says:

The Russian nation is a new and wonderful phenomenon in the
history of mankind. The character of the people differs to such
an extent from that of the other Europeans that their neighbors
find it impossible to diagnose them.

He says that those other European nations may maintain
that they have at heart a common aim and a common
ideal. In fact, they are divided among themselves by a
thousand interests, territorial or otherwise. Each pulls his
own way with ever-growing determination. It would seem
that every individual nation aspires to the discovery of the
universal ideal of humanity, and is bent on attaining that
ideal by force of its own unaided strength. Hence, Dos-
toyevsky argued, each European nation is an enemy to its
own welfare and that of the world in general. To quote

All Europeans move forward towards the same goal. But
they differ in their fundaments J Interests, which involve them in
collisions and antagonisms, wheeeby they are driven to go different
ways. The ideal of an universal humanity is steadily fading
from among them. The Russian people possess a notable ad-
vantage over the other European nations— a remarkable pe-
culiarity.

Trag, ne svidja mi se tvoje defetisticko razmišljanje.
Pitam se da li si ti muskarac ili možda zuti?
Da li za novac ovde siris defetizam?

A German poet at the beginning of the nine-
teenth century, Friedrich M. von Klinger (1752-1831),
divides all people into two divisions: (I) men and (II)
Russians.
The Germans maintain the necessity of exter-
minating, if not all Slavs, at least the Poles, whom they con-
sider as culpable for not wishing to loše themselves in the
German stock, which is almost an identical case with the
Lusatian Serbs. Hegel does not think it necessary to men-
tion the Slav in his work.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Totalno tačno. Posebno je značajno na ovom forumu podsetiti na tu divljačku mržnju Nemaca prema Poljacima kao prema inferiornoj rasi. Nisu samo Srbi i Rusi žrtve nemačkog antislavizma, milioni Poljaka su pobijeni u II svetskom ratu od strane Germana samo zato što su Poljaci/Sloveni.

To pokazuje da nisu samo pravoslavni Sloveni predmet mržnje i istrebljenja nego su i katolički Sloveni.

Genocid nad Slovenima odneo je 25-30 miliona slovenskih života, posebmo ruskih, poljskih, srpskih.

Sloveni moraju da se ujedine da bi preživeli, kome to nije jasno ništa mu nije jasno.

Mislim, Tabanac, da si u pravu 100%. Radi se bas na tome da se obnovi carstvo Habsburgovaca djuture sa starim kolonijama na Balkanu. A zna se, kolonisti su bili i biće sluge. Otici će iz EU, uskoro, Englezi, Francuzi, Spanci, Skandinavci...Belgija se raspada a centar iz Brisela seli se u Bec.

Istorija se ponavlja, koplje se opet lomi preko srpskih ledja, srećom da smo ovako zilavi.

Odluka, na 750 strana, o podeli sveta potpisana je na Malti 1988 godine, potpisali su je Bus (stariji) i Gorbacov i 23 godine se bukvalno sprovodi u delo.

Pratim jednu diskusiju o nasem poreklu, na nemackom, pa ko voli nek izvili.

http://www.geschichtsforum.de/f77/die-herkunft-der-serben-1230/