Pozdrav Srbine.

Srbendo.

Dobrodosao na podforum „Religija” (dosadno na podforumu „Politika”, zar ne?).

Gadni ti „islamski zakoni”.

Mada, ovde smo imali priliku da procitamo još gore stvari od toga, kao npr. ovo:

Muslimani spalili hrišćane žive:

http://www.siotw.org/modules/news_english/item.php?itemid=498

Međutim, kad covek proveri vest, ispade nešto sasvim deseto:

http://wafflesatnoon.com/2011/10/16/nigerian-christians-burnt-alive-photo-hate-mongering-fake/
Zatim, imali smo priliku da procitamo i sledeće:

8 дец 2011 – Imam je citiran u el-Senousa vijestima, u kojima tvrde da je rekao da ukoliko žene žele jesti krastavac ili bananu, muž ili otac im trebaju hranu ...

ili na engleskom:

„An Islamic cleric residing in Europe said that women should not be close to bananas or cucumbers, in order to avoid any ”sexual thoughts.„
The unnamed sheikh, who was featured in an article on el-Senousa news, was quoted saying that if women wish to eat these food items, a third party, preferably a male related to them such as their a father or husband, should cut the items into small pieces and serve”.

i to ovde:

www1.serbiancafe.com/.../imam-banane-krastavci (Gugl pretrazivac locira link sa delom teksta na SC-u, ali link nije aktivan).

Na opste razocarenje islamofobosfere, i ta „vest” je fake:

Ne postoji „nepostojeci, neimenovani imam” koji je rekao tako nešto (a i da je rekao, opet ništa).

I, sto je još bitnije, ne postoje „El-Senousa” vesti.

Sada imamo nešto novo, nešto sto islamofobi koriste da obmanjuju, sire mrznju i Brejvika velicaju kao heroja:

Opet fake vest:

The new myth is that Islam somehow promotes…*drum roll*…necrophilia!

While you can likely find a fatwa for everything ( :`))))))) when the recent story claiming that the „Egyptian parliament was considering passing a law that would allow husbands to have sex with their wives after death” went viral, the BS meter shot up pretty high for us.

But not for many mainstream media outlets who ran with the story without fact checking, thereby reinforcing Islamophobic myths and anti-Islam talking points.

Despite the ardent desire on behalf of Islamophobes such as Bobby Spencer (he saw it as evidence of Sharia’ takeover) for the story to be true it was revealed pretty quickly that it was a hoax.

Spencer still has not updated the story to point out that it was a hoax. Now a lot of the haters have egg on their faces, this is not the first or the last time that such lies will be promoted in the media.(h/t:ZH)

Egypt ‘necrophilia law’? Hooey, utter hooey.
(Christian Science Monitor)

Today, Egypt‘s state-owned Al Ahram newspaper published an opinion piece by Amr Abdul Samea, a past stalwart supporter of the deposed Hosni Mubarak, that contained a bombshell: Egypt’s parliament is considering passing a law that would allow husbands to have sex with their wives after death.

It was soon mentioned in an English language version of Al-Arabiya and immediately started zipping around social-networking sites. By this afternoon it had set news sites and the rest of the Internet on fire. It has every thing:
The yuck factor,
„those creepy Muslims” factor,
the lulz factor for those with a sick sense of humor.

The non-fact-checked Daily Mail picked it up and reported it as fact. Then Andrew Sullivan, who has a highly influential blog but is frequently lax about fact-checking, gave it a boost with an uncritical take. TheHuffington Post went there, too.

There’s of course one problem: The chances of any such piece of legislation being considered by the Egyptian parliament for a vote is zero. And the chance of it ever passing is less than that. In fact, color me highly skeptical that anyone is even trying to advance a piece of legislation like this through Egypt’s parliament.

But extreme, not to mention inflammatory claims, need at minimum some evidence (and I’ve read my share of utter nonsense in Al Ahram over the years). The evidence right now? Zero.

Stories like this are a reminder of the downside of the Internet. It makes fact-checking and monitoring easier. But the proliferation of aggregation sites, newsy blog sites, and the general erosion of editorial standards (and on-the-ground reporters to do the heavy lifting) also spreads silliness faster than it ever could before.

http://www.islamophobiatoday.com/