Iskreno da kažem, ja nisa pratila tu problematiku. Godinama sam imala previse toga na dnevnom redu da bih još bistrila politiku. Cela ta situacija sa chamdzijama je apsurdna. Dolaze iz kojekakvih Nedodjija i ocekuju ovde šta? Da Australija samo njih ceka? Da li su zaista toliko neobavesteni, da li ih obrlate likovi koji im uzimaju poslednju kintu da ih iskrcaju na obale Australije ili idu grlom u jagode, poput guski kroz maglu pa šta bude, biće... Silni izginuse kada se ti nazovi brodovi prevrnu, mala deca, žene, ko zna koliko ih zavrsi dok su se tako nadali boljem zivotu u Australiji... Govore da su politicke izbeglice, uglavnom nemaju nikakve kvalifikacije i, šta sa njima? Mislim, volela bih da znam šta oni zaista ocekuju od Australije? Da dobiju odmah socijalnu i svu potrebnu pomoć, posao i sve sto uz to ide? Koliko je onih koji su se ovde rodili a jedva sastavljaju kraj sa krajem, pa ne mogu da racunaju na državu da rese svoje probleme, samo još desetine hiljada chamdzija fali sa svojim ocekivanjima. A na kraju dana, samo su lopta kojom se politicari dobacuju u cilju prikupljanja pluseva za svoje izbore.

http://tinyurl.com/lb6lzap

$8000 po glavi za mesto na brodu?

Videcemo šta će biti. Sinoć sam do pola tri citala u krevetu na tu temu.

Svideo mi se ovaj komentar:

Fran
4 December, 2012 at 11:11 am

This essay provides a good argument for why Australia should withdraw from the UN refugee convention. At present, this agreement is being abused by fraudsters & cheats – most especially, immigration lawyers, & the refugee lobby industry fueling the endless court cases, appeals, more appeals, & so on. (Not suggesting for a moment that all applicants are frauds, but too many have been shown to be rorting the system). It is hugely divisive in our society. If the UN does not agree to radically update this agreement, & remove the loopholes that are currently being abused; then we should rid ourselves of this yoke that a former generation of politicians unwittingly put upon our country;

The reason the UN hasn’t agreed to making changes in the refugee convention, is that they know very well that many countries would not be so gullible & trusting this time around, & won’t allow their sovereignty & rights to be stripped away so easily in future. The UK & much of Europe are already experiencing the results of being shackled to this outdated convention. It was made for totally different circumstances than exist today. In fact, all UN agreements should have sunset clauses, or at least have periodic review. To expect something that a politician of the day signs, to be binding on a country forever into the future, is ludicrous.

If Australia did withdraw from the UN convention, (which is very easily done, & only requires giving 1 year’s notice) – then we could design our own refugee policy, which can’t be rorted & abused. We could help the same number of people, but do so better, & at far less cost to taxpayers. We could take in those already deemed to be refugees by UNHCR; (the body set up & funded to do just this); saving our country a fortune by not having to process mountains of applications, & then the typical opportunistic appeals that are tying up our court systems, & costing taxpayers a fortune. We wouldn’t have the diabolical problem of having to permanently accommodate people who are found to be a security risk to the country, but who refuse to leave when rejected. As they’ve already been deemed legitimate by UNHCR & not a security risk, refugees could come straight in to the country, & that would save Australia a fortune too. We could give preference to people who at present, have no hope of ever getting here; people who don’t have the money to pay criminal syndicates for a boat ride; & who are far more vulnerable & needy than those currently taking advantage of our country’s generosity.

What any new refugee policy should also include, is to provide placement for an equal division of religions & nationalities, instead of the lopsided intake we have at present. If it were more evenly spread, it would lead to far less social problems in future, than an intake heavily weighted on any one particular religious group or nationality. We should also insist that refugee settlement occurs in diverse places; not just in pockets in our already overcrowded & overburdened cities & suburbs. There are rural areas crying out for people. Many of those areas also have unskilled labor shortages, so it could be a win win situation.

Designing our own policy to match our country’s individual & current circumstances, would be the solution to this divisive problem. Beating people over the head with clauses from an outdated, & chronically misused refugee agreement, which politicians from a
former generation signed, (& hardly any of the signatory countries comply with any longer), is not.

================
Ovo je svakom normalnom jasno kao dan i ne znam zašto nešto ne menjaju po tom pitanju:

What any new refugee policy should also include, is to provide placement for an equal division of religions & nationalities, instead of the lopsided intake we have at present. If it were more evenly spread, it would lead to far less social problems in future, than an intake heavily weighted on any one particular religious group or nationality. We should also insist that refugee settlement occurs in diverse places; not just in pockets in our already overcrowded & overburdened cities & suburbs. There are rural areas crying out for people. Many of those areas also have unskilled labor shortages, so it could be a win win situation.
---

Uvezli su kojekakve po bogtepita kojim kriterijumima koji posle hoće ovde da teraju kako su navikli po svojim zabitima. Mesaju kulture koje nemaju ništa zajednicko. Inače, svako u svoju kucu prima onog ko mu odgovara. A Australija u tom izboru se ponasa kao da nema grama mozga. Niti razmišlja o posledicama takve katastrofalne „selekcije' po buducnost zemlje.

”