da, mogu da nas optuže za fašizam i urušavanje američke demokratije i evropskih vrednosti ! ;)

ma naravno, bolja je americka demokratija kao sada u Iraku i Avganistanu. U Iraku su sve resili tako što su ubili diktatora, sad je: ne može biti bolje. A i kod nas je bolje od kad su nam amerikanci bacili uranijum. Ma gde se god pojave, usrece narod. Treba podrzati amerikenjce !

Pompezni
zašto bi mi trebali da podržavamo krvavog diktatora koji je 200 puta gori od Slobe?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Možda je tebi bilo dobro u slobino vreme. Ja ga ne pamtim po ičem dobrom i poređenje Gadafija sa njim je nebulozno.
Pogledaj šta kaže Lazanski za njega.
http://www.rts.rs/page/tv/sr/story/22/RTS+Satelit/860736/Upitnik.html

О „крвавом диктатору”

Живот у Либији под ,,диктатором`` Гадафијем:
1. бескаматни кредити у току студија;
2. прима се просечна плата за то занимање ако не нађеш посао након
завршеног факултета;
3. држава плаћа као да радиш у струци;
4. по ступању у брачну заједницу држава поклања стан или кућу;
5. куповина возила по фабричкој цени;
6. никоме не дугују ни цента;
7. бесплатно здравство и образовање;
8. 25% људи високо образовано,
9. 40 хлебова кошта 0.15$

15 litara benzina = 1 euro !
To ne pokriva ni troskove struje na pumpama.
Pa ne valja biti previse dobar. Trebao je da ulaze novac u moderne rakete, a ne da cuva po francuskim bankama, pa da ga kradu. Za koga je stedeo ? Pre mu ubise dete u kolevci, a sada i sina. Daa je neki hohstapler, on bi sada sa tom lovom zbrisao iz Libije, ko nas Miskovic.

ja u Italiji ne videh ni jednog Libijca da je dosao da radi. Ima Tunizana, Alziraca, Marokanaca, ali Libijcima nije ni potrebno da budu gastarbajteri. Ali eto i to im ne odgovara ! Opet im je Gaddafi neprijatelj. Kad dobiju uranijum po glavi stanovnika, onda će im biti bolje, kao danas Pompeznom.

naravno, mi Amerikanci uvek stitimo jedni druge, gde god se nalazimo. cuz we r The Americans!

Negde sam skoro procitao da mu je porodicni imetak oko 150 milijardi dolara.
Pa se mislim,ako je i 50% tačno,mnogooo je kume.

Inače porodicni lekar mi je Libijac,ono sto mi je on rekao za Gadafija
je da je lik monstrum,ubija na jedan.

„Beogradski_sindikat
26. mart 2011. u 12.53

Negde sam skoro procitao da mu je porodicni imetak oko 150 milijardi dolara. Pa se mislim,ako je i 50% tačno,mnogooo je kume.”

pa jbg brate, vredan covek, prenosio gajbicu, ko ti kriv sto ti nisi. gajbica po gajbica, i eto ti 150 milijardi. inače kažu da je on jedan od najbogatijih ljudi na svetu. e sto volim kad posten covek tako uspe svojim trudom i radom.

„Inače porodicni lekar mi je Libijac,ono sto mi je on rekao za Gadafija
je da je lik monstrum,ubija na jedan.”

ko?!?! Gadafi!!??? ma nemoguće, bas deluje kao dobar i plemenit covek, koji nebi ni mrava zgazio. pravo jagnjesce.

Inače porodicni lekar mi je Libijac,ono sto mi je on rekao za Gadafija
je da je lik monstrum,ubija na jedan.
---
Ма јок, пустиће разне сека персе да га карају!

А шта су то ове наше „демократе” урадиле„ Колико смо тренутно дужни и где је та лова? Пошто овај мост преко Саве? Мали пример... А о политици - само изјава од Тадићија - ”Ако изаберете Николића за председника, сутра ће ЗАПАД признати Косово„. Пошто је он изабран, исти тај запад је колико три дана после избора признао исто то Косово...
Имамо окупиран део територије, највећу војну базу НЕПРИЈАТЕЉА на нашој територији, демолирану државу и да не набрајам.
Изузетно много разлога да волим америку и да подржим даље срљање у еу. Заболе ме. Нека се бре терају у три лепе са својом демократијом.

Дај бре Хозе, олади мало са тим твојим силеџијама. Ово са Либијом је чиста пљачка као и са Ираком. Где је то страшно наоружање од Садама? И шта сада када нема тог наоружања? Што се лепо не повуку и не престану да убијају Ирачане?
”

Mostro:
„ja u Italiji ne videh ni jednog Libijca da je dosao da radi. Ima Tunizana, Alziraca, Marokanaca, ali Libijcima nije ni potrebno da budu gastarbajteri.”

A je si li video Kenijca?
Nisi.
Kenija je vrlo siromasna zemlja.

I ta konstatacija sto „nisi video” ne mora da znaci i nije merodavno da se oceni bilo šta.

Oni stvarno siromasni ne mogu ni da privire u Evropu ni bilo gde.
Nazalost to je vecina.

Sretni ako imaju parce hleba ,i prevzoz do doktora i pare za doktora i lekove.

Samo pravi „bogatasi” mogu da imigriraju.
A sto nema Libijaca u Italiji hehe,pa upucaju ih samo i kad pomisle da ilegalno izadju iz zemlje(legalno ne može)

A po ugovoru između Italije i Libije, Libijci su automatski vraceni odakle su posli.Tj .u libijski zatvor i kao izdajnici likvidirani.

Malo bajato, ali je tehnika ista.
copy/paste sa diskusije „humor”

G.W.Bush...

Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?
A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction honey.

Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.
A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.

Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?
A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.

Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?
A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right before the 2004 election.

Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?
A: To use them in a war, silly.

Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?
A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.

Q: That doesn't make sense Daddy. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons to fight us back with?
A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.

Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons our government said they did.
A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons.We had another good reason to invade them anyway.

Q: And what was that?
A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.

Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country?
A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.

Q: Kind of like what they do in China?
A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations richer.

Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it's a good country, even if that country tortures people?
A: Right.

Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?
A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.

Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?
A: I told you, China is different.

Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?
A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while China is Communist.

Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?
A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.

Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?
A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.

Q: Like in Iraq?
A: Exactly.

Q: And like in China, too?
A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not.

Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?
A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.

Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalists?
A: Don't be a smart-a$$.

Q: I didn't think I was being one.
A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.

Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?
A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a Legitimate leader anyway.

Q: What's a military coup?
A: That's when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.

Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?
A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our friend.

Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?
A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.

Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an Illegitimate leader?
A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us invade Afghanistan.

Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?
A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.

Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?
A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men - Fifteen of them Saudi Arabians - hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over 3,000 Americans.

Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?
A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban.

Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people's heads and hands?
A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people's heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.

Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?
A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs.

Q: Fighting drugs?
A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies.

Q: How did they do such a good job?
A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.

Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads and hands off for other reasons?
A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people's hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off people's hands for stealing bread.

Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?
A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.

Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?
A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.

Q: What's the difference?
A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers.

Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.
A: Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our friends.

Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia.
A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.

Q: Who trained them?
A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.

Q: Was he from Afghanistan?
A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad man.

Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.
A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.

Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?
A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call them Russians now.

Q: So the Soviets ? I mean, the Russians ? are now our friends?
A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our invasion of Iraq, so we're mad at them now. We're also mad at the French and the Germans because they didn't help us invade Iraq either.

Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?
A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.

Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn't do what we want them to do?
A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.

Q: But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s?
A: Well, yeah. For a while.

Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?
A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily.

Q: Why did that make him our friend?
A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.

Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?
A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.

Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically Becomes our friend?
A: Most of the time, yes.

Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy?
A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American corporations can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.

Q: Why?
A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America. Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who opposes war is a godless un-American Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?

Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?
A: Yes.

Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?
A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what to do.

Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?
A. Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.

Q: Good night, Daddy

Pompezni tebi su ameri isprali mozak. Kasno si se vratio u domovinu, kasno!

Za Gadafija do kraja!

Mostro
(junior member)26. mart 2011. u 14.53nema takvog ugovora. To si izmislila.
__

Hehe Mostro kakvi izmislila!Ne da je ugovor nego je i zakon.
Nemam ti ja vremena da trkljam po internetu i tražim izvore da ti ih ovde predstavim.
Ali kad ti kažem da je tako, veruj mi na reč jer znam, znaju svi.
Ima ugovor i dogovor izmenju Libije i Italije o emi-imigraciji.

Funkcionisalo je super do sada.

Sada kom obujci kom opanci.

p.s.

i nemoj nikad vise da mi kažeš da izmišljam.nije lepo.

Zviz i Vagabundo,

vi ste tipican primerak stoke kojoj treba cvrsta ruka, kao i Kenjari, i zato volite diktatore. vi jednostavno niste za slobodu i demokratiju.

da je Gadafi neko moodo, kao sto vi tvrdite, nebi njega karao ceo svet sada, već bi bilo obrnuto. bilo kako bilo, otprdeo je taj svoje na ovom svetu...kraj mu se bilizi...hehehehehe...jedva cekam da ga vidim tako kurcevitog sa omcom oko vrata, kao onog smrada Sadama.

Zviz,

nisi ti mene skapirao. pa ja prvi uvek kažem da je cela ta prica o demokratiji najobičnija farsa i prica za budale koje su spremne da u nju veruju. izgleda da nisi pazljivo pratio moj lik i delo. zato se uozbilji, nemoj da moram da te obaram na popravni! evo dacu ti još jednu sansu da naucis, ukratko: demokratija je jedan nedostizni ideal, isto kao i komunizam, i kao takva ona nikada nigde nije ni postojala u svom pravom obliku, a neće ni postojati jer ljudi uopste nisu dorasli takvim stvarima...ALI, zapadna drustva su ipak mnogo bliza tom nedostiznom idealu nego sto smo to recimo mi, Libija, Irak, Rusija, Kina i ostale fasisticke diktature ikada bile...na zapadu ti je isto policijska diktatura, ali malo suptilnija i koja ipak dozvoljava svojim gradjanima vise sloboda nego gore pomenuta drustva...o civilizacijskom nivou i kulturi neću ni da pricam...

a što se tiče bombardovanja '99, bilo mi je naravno zao kad izrokaju civile, ali kad su bombardovali recimo mup, sup, generalstab, Slobine vile po dedinju i njegove specijalce i ostale go*nare koji su ga cuvali na vlasti, naravno da mi je bilo drago. sto, jesam trebao možda da placem?!? da je sreće da neko i sad izroka skupstinu sa svim poslanicima, bio bi to pravi sevap.

ne znam zašto sam ti i ovoliko odgovorio, jer uopste mi nije namera da se nešto objašnjavam, ti brate veruj u šta hoćeš, to je tvoj problem. mene nećeš ubediti u svoje stavove, i vi slobodno placite i kukajte koliko god hocete za Gadafijem, kao sto ste ocigledno i za Slobom, ali njegovi dani su odbrojani...gotovo je...sat neumoljivo otkucava...tik-tak, tik-tak...hehehehe

Дођи на „Навијаче” :)))

Mora da mi je neka grobarcina dala - ?!
Il' pak neki naturalizovani cemerikanac?
Eto kakvi su to ljudi tj NEljudi. :)