Што се бре толико оптерећујете Русијом!? Па... неко је воли, неко је не воли, боже мој.

Je l' taj Svetlost pisao stogod o Cernobilu?

„REALITY: From 1999-2007, only 37% of the increase in the crude birth rate was due to an increase in the size of the childbearing age segment of the population (only 10% in 2007 itself). The rest came from an increase in the total fertility rate (TFR), the average number of children a woman can be expected to have over a lifetime, irrespective of the structure of the age pyramid.

Speaking of which, Russia's TFR has risen from a nadir of 1.16 children per women in 1999, to 1.49 children in 2008 (and thus also breaking the ”lowest-low„ fertility hypothesis that states that no society has ever recovered from a fertility collapse to below 1.30 children). The figures for 2009 will almost certainly show a TFR above 1.50.

This is not to say that the coming reduction in the fertility contribution of the 1980's ”youth bulge„ will not exert a growing downwards pressure on Russian birth rates in the next two decades. However, a growing TFR will be able to partially, or even fully, counteract these adverse trends.

3. MYTH: The recent rise in fertility is small and fragile, based on the temporary effects of new maternity benefits and pro-natality propaganda. It will shatter as soon as the first economic crisis interrupts Russia's petro-fueled swagger.

REALITY: It is true that Russia's current TFR, at 1.5 children per woman, is well below the 2.1 needed for long-term population stability. That said, there are compelling reasons to believe that we seeing an incipient fertility reversal in Russia.

First, fertility expectations today are little different from those of the late Soviet era when the TFR was near replacement level. According to numerous surveys since the early 1990's, Russians consistently say they want to have an average of 2.5 children. This is broadly similar to respondents from the British Isles, France and Scandinavia, who have relatively healthy TFR's of around 1.7-2.1. This suggests Russia's post-Soviet fertility collapse was caused by ”transition shock„ rather than a ”values realignment„ to middle-European norms, where people only want 1.7-1.8 children.

Second, a major problem with the TFR is that it ignores the effects of birth timing. A more accurate measure of long-term fertility is the average birth sequence (ABS), which gives the mean order of all newborn children. If in one fine year all women in a previously childless country decide to give birth for some reason, the TFR will soar to an absurdly high level but the ABS will equal exactly one.

In Russia the ABS remained steady at 1.6 children per woman from 1992-2006, little changed from the 1.8 of Soviet times, even though the TFR plummeted well below this number. This indicates that many women were postponing children until they settled into careers and improved their material wellbeing -- a hypothesis attested to by the rising age of mothers at childbirth since 1993. As such, it is not unreasonable to expect a compensatory fertility boom in the 2010's.

Though this may be a false positive if many women remain childless, the 2002 Census indicated that only 6-7% of women did not have any children by the end of their reproductive years. This indicates that childlessness is not in vogue and worries about widespread abortion-induced sterility are overblown.

Third, a new, confident conservatism has recently taken hold in Russian society. After two decades of disillusionment, at the end of 2006 consistently more Russians began to believe the nation was moving in a positive than in a negative direction. The state began to reconstruct an ideological basis for belief in Russia's future, which included the aforementioned maternal benefits and pro-natality campaigns - and contrary to pessimist assertions, the examples of France and Sweden indicate that such efforts tend to be successful at incubating longterm improvements in TFR. Can it really be the case that the genesis of Russia's rediscovery of belief in itself, and of consistent improvements in its demography, were a matter of mere coincidence?

Fourth, the cohort now entering the workforce will probably enjoy greater job opportunities and higher wages because of the imminent shrinking of Russia's labor force. This may provide incentives to marry earlier and have more children, which would compensate for this cohort's smaller size. Nor are they likely to be subjected to taxes high enough to discourage family formation; relative to continental Europe, Russia is still a younger nation and can be expected to enjoy high energy revenues in the post-peak oil age.”

„REALITY: Quite apart from this being a ”mystical„ explanation for national decline, and hence unscientific, this assertion is not backed up by the historical record. All these social ills first manifested themselves in the USSR from around 1965 (accompanied by sky-rocketing male mortality rates), yet nonetheless, that did not preclude Russia from maintaining a near replacement level TFR until the Soviet Union's dissolution - and ultimately, that is all that matters for maintaining longterm population stability.

The Russian abortion rate was nearly twice as high during the Soviet period relative to today, but today's prevalent fears of widespread infertility as a byproduct somehow never materialized - the 2002 Census indicated that only 6-7% of women did not have any children by the end of their reproductive years. Today, abortions continue on their longterm decline, even in the aftermath of the late-2008 economic crisis (and despite the hysterical predictions to the contrary).

Similarly, excessive alcohol consumption - the major cause of ”hypermortality„ amongst middle-aged Russian men - set in long before the post-Soviet demographic collapse. (Observe how closely Russia's historical mortality trends correlate to Nemtsov's estimates of alcohol consumption in the graph below). Yet as mentioned above, high middle-aged male mortality rates have no direct impact on fertility rates. Furthermore, since there is no major discrepancy between the numbers of men and women until the age of 40, women have no physical problem in finding mates (though it is true that high mortality and alcoholism amongst males has a suppressing effect on new couple formation, the late Soviet experience suggests that it does not altogether preclude a healthy TFR).

The demographer Eberstadt asserts that Russia's high mortality rates preclude human capital formation through education because men facing elevated mortality risks (supposedly) discount its future value; consequently, this dims the prospects for longterm economic growth. This hypothesis doesn't stand up to the evidence. The late Soviet Union had one of the world's highest tertiary enrollment rates, and more than 70% of today's Russians get a higher education. This should not be surprising due to human psychological factors - ”deaths from heart disease and accidents only happen to other people„; and besides, even if a Russian man assumes he'll die in his 50's or 60's, he'd still rather live comfortably, avoid the military draft, etc, than sweep the streets. So this argument is flawed on many, many levels.

It is true that poor health lowers economic productivity. However, one should note the caveats that 1) hypermortality disproportionately effects poorer, lower-educated people, 2) in the post-agrarian society, the main driver of productivity improvements is education - not health, and 3) there is a silver lining in that by curbing aging, a low life expectancy also relieves pressure on pensions. Finally, drunkenness by itself cannot check the growth of a vital civilization -- after all, America was known as the Alcoholic Republic during the early 19th century.”

„6. MYTH: The ruling elite's criminal neglect of Russia's growing AIDS crisis will soon result in hundreds of thousands of annual deaths, further accelerating its demographic collapse.

REALITY: Institutions like the World Bank were predicting hundreds of thousands of deaths by 2010, yet the death toll for 2008 was only 12,800. Further, the percentage of pregnant women testing HIV positive plateaued in 2002, suggesting the epidemic remains essentially contained among injecting drug users.

The problem with the ”doomer„ models used to predict apocalypse (Eberstadt, NIC, Ruhl et al, etc) is that their projections of imminent mass deaths from AIDS unrealistically assume heterosexual, sub-Saharan Africa transmission patterns, which is unbacked by sociological analysis or surveillance data. A more rigorous model by the Knowledge for Action in HIV/AIDS in Russia research program predicts a peak HIV prevalence rate of under 1% of the total Russian population by around 2020. Thus far, it correlates with reality.

Finally, following a period of real neglect of the problem until 2005, the Russian state has since ramped up spending on AIDS to an annual 0.5bn $. One can no longer speak of official negligence.

7. MYTH: Faster-breeding Muslims will constitute the majority of the Russian Federation's citizens by 2050, placing the dwindling Orthodox Russians under a brutal dhimmitude.

REALITY: Ethnic Russians still make up nearly 80% of the population, whereas only 4-6% of the population consider themselves to be Muslim in opinion polls. The fertility rates of the biggest Muslim ethnicities, Tatars and Bashkirs, is little different from the national average.

Even the Caucasian Muslim republics experienced a drastic fertility transition in the last twenty years, as a result of which the only one to still have an above-replacement level TFR is Chechnya. However, Chechnya's 1.2mn people constitute less than 1% of the Russian total.

So the fact of the matter is that Russian Muslims simply do not have the demographic base to become anywhere near the Federation's majority ethnicity in the foreseeable future.

Furthermore, the main reason some people fear - or relish - the prospect of an Islamic Russia is because they associate Russian Muslims with their less progressive co-religionists in the Middle East. In reality, vodka has long since dissolved away the Koran in Russia. The vast majority of Muslim Russians are loyal citizens, having made their peace with the imperial Russian state long ago; imminent dhimmitude is a myth, the product of fevered imaginations.

8. MYTH: The Chinese are taking over the depopulating Russian Far East by a stealth demographic invasion; tempted by Siberian Lebensraum and vast mineral riches, they will eventually seize it outright from a weakening Russia.

REALITY: There are no more than 0.4-0.5mn Chinese in Russia (and probably a good deal less). The vast majority of them are temporary workers and seasonal traders who have no long-term plans of settling in Russia. Even though the Russia Far East depopulated much faster than the rest of Russia after the Soviet collapse, at more than 6mn today, Russian citizens remain ethnically dominant.”

„10. MYTH: Okay then, the vast majority of models by respectable institutions - i.e., not those of Kremlin mouthpieces like Rosstat or yourself - project that Russia's population is going to plummet to 100mn or so people by 2050.

REALITY: First, appeal to authority & association fallacy. Second, you can check the reliability of my model because my source code is open and accessible for all, which is more than you can say for many of these ”respectable institutions„. Third, the problem with the aforementioned ”doomer„ models is that they are all essentially based on linearly extrapolating Russia's post-Soviet fertility and mortality situation into the far future, assuming negligible improvements or even a deterioration (as in the models including the imminent, but fortunately non-existent, African-style AIDS epidemic).

It is my belief that Russia's demographic ”doomers„ ignore the importance of the post-Soviet resilience of Russia's fertility expectations, the evidence that Russia's post-Soviet demographic collapse was just an aberration caused by its wrenching transition to a new socio-political system, and the newly-emerging sociological trends that are returning Russia's to its past-and-future Empire - trends that are restoring Russians' faith in the future, reinforcing social conservatism, and creating the conditions, with the Kremlin's active support, for a major demographic reversal out of the post-Soviet abyss.

I would be the first to admit that this interpretation of Russian society may be incorrect, and consequently so are my ”optimistic„ demographic projections. Feel free to disagree with my interpretation, but do note that 1) I accurately called the economic crisis as a non-event in relation to Russia's demography and 2) made falsifiable, near-term predictions about Russia's future demography, which few other crystal-ball gazers care to do.

Speaking of crystal balls, I would like to end this by noting that pretty much all demographic projections beyond 20 years into the future - the approximate time needed for a new cohort to reach reproductive age - are near-useless in practical terms. Any simplistic extrapolation will eventually founder on the discontinuities inevitably produced by complex human systems: for a past example, compare 20th century French and German demographic history; regarding the future, note the profoundly disruptive potential of two strong concurrent trends - limits to growth, and technological singularity - either of which could so radically transform human life in the 21st century, as to render modern demographic analysis meaningless as a scientific tool.

Anatoly Karlin is an independent blogger who writes about Russia, geopolitics, and global trends at his blog Sublime Oblivion. He is currently working on a book about the ”future history„ of the 21st century.”

Nemoj tako Povratak Otpisanih, mis'm ipak su ovo fakti koje iznosi kredibilna organizacija WHO. ;-)

Sjetite se WHO i H1N1.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4R9eDdq6CE&NR=1

a ja ću ti naći još grozomornije scene, neće biti lako ali dosta sam ja proplakala za ovo prokleto covecanstvo, JA PLACEM ZBOG LJUDI!!!!

Samo da muž pristane da ide sa mnom, zaista ne smem sama tamo.

onda ću i ja prestati ovde da postiram price sa druge strane medalje. <<
Nisu ovo price sa druge strane medalje, već koristis uboge zivote ove djecice da zadovoljis svoju pokvarenu dusu.
Gledam gore iz hira postavljas Cernobilsku katastrofu?!
Odakle ti pravo da potezes nečije sudbine zarad sopstvenog likovanja, lujko nevidjena?

Zašto ne pišes o gradovima Hirosima i Nagasaki gdje je neko IZ HIRA usmrtio milione?!

Ja nikome neću da protivurecim propagandom jedna ana, nego onako kako je realno, bar iz mog ugla realno, a trudim se da budem objektivna sto je vise moguće. A i pojma nemam kako je u Rusiji i kako god da je ja tamo ne živim niti ću ikada živeti, možda čak ni posetiti. Ali da mi se predstavlja Rusija ovako kako si ti uradila, pa još i kad vidim od koga je rezirano, ma idi bre! Pa da naravno, ovo je samo početak, Rusija će sve vise i vise biti nacisticka, opresivna, korumpirana, bolesna(a pazi ovo - BOLESNI TAMO SKORO SVI - hahahhaha, hoće da kažu da u Rusiju pod hitno treba poslati vojsku „lekara bez granica”, da ih „lece” :)))), tako to ide. Već vidjeno.

Ova luda skroz naskroz.

Видиш Ана, грјешиш. И те како има везе са САД-ом. Јер, ако пљујеш по једној земљи, или по неким њеним аспектима, онда је реално да се упореди та земља са неком јој сличној. Америка ми је прва пала на памет, а и најјбоље су за поређење.
Ти црни Руско здравство, ја ћу ти задавати питања, по поводу Америчког. Можемо до Нове године, само ја немам јако много слободног времена.

Твој лични живот ме се апсолутно не тиче, ту си сасвим у праву, нити ме он занима. Написала си да си живјела у РФ, па сам те питао у којем мјесту и које године, што на самом дјелу није мјешање у твој лични живот. Моје је мишљење да ти тамо ногом крочила ниси, а камоли да си проживјела неко врјеме.

:)))