HAARP sistem je posebna tema ali je princip delovanja na bazi elektromagnetnih talasa..

Što se tiče sami zracenja mogu se meriti skoro sva zracenja sa uredjajima ali samo merenje nas neće zastititi..

Zakacicu neke informacije na srpskom da bi bilo svima lakse, mada sma dao link sajta na engleskom gde imate bas mnogo informacija koje vam mogu dati sve potrebne odgovore oko EMF stetnih zracenja...

Za prvi put donesen zakon za zračenje mobilnih telefona

San Francisko - U ovom gradu poznatom po donošenju zakona koji su često sporni, zakonodavci su energično zakoračili u drugu debatu - ovaj put za potencijalnu opasnost od korištenja mobilnih telefona.

Upravni odbor supervizora je glasao 10-1 u korist uredbe, gradonačelnik Gevin Njusom je potvrdio da će da potpiše uredbu. San Francisko je zakoračio u još nerešenu debatu za odnos između dugoročne upotrebe mobilnih telefona i zdravstvenih problema, kao što je tumor na mozgu. To će biti prvi zakon u zemlji koji traži od trgovaca mobilnih telefona da otkriju specifičnu apsorbciju radijacije kod korisnika (SAR). SAR meri maksimalnu vrednost radijacije koja se apsorbira od strane lica koje koristi mobilni telefon. Federalna komisija za komunikacije ograničava zračenje ( SAR ) u proseku od 1.6 vati po kilogramu na telu, ali informacije za nivo zračenja obično nisu lako dostupne kada ljudi kupuju telefone u prodavnici.

„Iz naše perspective, ovo je mnogo razumna i prilično skromna mera koja obezbediti veću transparetnost i informacije korisnicima za koje ova oblast predstavlja brigu ili interes”, izjavi portparol na Njusam - Toni Viniker, koji je istaknuo da gradonačelnik je I-Phone korisnik. „Mi igramo ulogu koju smo oduvek imali a to je da budemo u prvim redovima debata”

Još uvek nakon velikog broja naučnih istraga za ovo pitanje nije postignut zaključak

Na primer, glavna studija na O.N. objavljenja prošlog meseca, nije pronašla jasne veze između mobilnih telefona i rizika od razvoja raka na mozgu.

Predstavnici ove industrije gledaju na ovo kao na razlog da zakon kao što je ovaj ne treba da se donese.
„Ti samo odgovaraju na neosnovane brige”, izjavi Džon Vols, portparol trgovačke grupe CTIA - bežična asocijacija. Taj izjavi da „zakon može da zbuni i da donese u zabludu potrošače”.

Advokati su izjavili da na uredbu gledaju prvenstveno kao pokušaj da se informišu potrošači. Rene Šarp, direktorka radne grupe za životnu sredinu sa sedištem u Kaliforniji, isto tako izjavi da se nada da će zakon urazumiti potrošače da ne kupuju mobilne telefone sa visokim nivoom radijacije dok se potpuno ne rasčisti ovo pitanje. Advokatska grupa je obezbedila izveštaje i druga mišljenja od gradskog odeljenja za životnu sredinu za razvoj njihove politike.

„Mi isto tako se nadamo da će to da potstakne veću debatu za to dali tekući federalni standardi su odgovarajući ili ne”, izjavi Šarp .
„Mi svakako ne računamo da će ljudi prekinuti da kupuju mobilne telefone zbog radijacije”.

Oficijalni funkcioneri u industriji ne Špekulišu za naneti udarac na njihov biznis, ali mnogi od najpopuularnijih mobilnih telefona imaju relativno visok stepen SAR. Ti je zato što mnogi od onih najpopularnijih telefona su pametni telefoni, koji imaju Wi-Fi i Bluetooth prijemnike, kako i osnovne mobilne sposobnosti koje pridonose visokom nivou SAR-a, misli Vols. Naspram zakona, veliki lanci za prodaju mobilnih telefona sa početkom od februara, moraće da stave SAR izveštaj na pakovanjima telofona, dok ostale prodavnice imaju rok do 2012 godine. Iako supervizori u velikoj meri su bili jednoglasni, reakcija izvan gradske skupštine i širom zemlje je bila izmešana.

„Ovo je odgovor od javnog straha, a ne realni dokazi rizika”, izjavi Dejvid Replek, instructor na Harvard Univerzitetu koji predaje o percepciji rizika.
„To je mera opreza na osnovu sugestije za rizik koji dolazi u velikom delu od naše urođene uznemirenosti kao I od ubedljivih dokaza”. Oprez tvrdi „Ne čekajte dokaze da postanu ubedljivi, to je lepa ideja osim što nekada nema vatre ispod dima”.

Izvor:

http://www.pxds.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=208&Itemid=6&lang=serbian_lat

BBC NEWS REPORTS:

Mobilni telefoni mogu da prouzrokuju Alchajmerovu bolest

Debata o bezbednosti mobilnih telefona se nastavlja

Mobilni telefoni oštećuju ključne moždane ćelije i mogu izazvati ran početak Alchajmerove bolesti, pokazuju studije.

Istraživanje u Švedskoj je otkrilo da zračenje mobilnih telefona oštećuje centre mozga povezane sa učenjem, pamćenjem i kretanjem.

Eksperimenti koji su bili sprovedeni na miševima načinili su pravi obrt u raspravama, jer su nedosmisleno potvrdili da su mobilni telefoni štetni po zdravlje.
Sa takvim ključnim dokazima studiju o tome objavili su profesor Leif Salford i njegove kolege na univerzitetu Lund u Malmeu.

Laboratorijske analize

Eksperimenti su sprovedeni na odraslim miševima starosti 12 i 26 nedelja. Njihovi mozgovi su slični nivou razvoja mozga kod tinejdžera. Miševi su bili izloženi dva sata zračenju istovetnom onom iz mobilnog telefona.

Njihovi mozgovi su mikroskopski bili analizirani 50 dana kasnije. Istraživači su otkrili da miševi, koji su bili izloženi srednjem i visokom nivou zračenja, imaju mnogo mrtvih moždanih ćelija.

Profesor Salford kaže da ima dobar razlog da veruje da mobilni telefoni imaju isti štetan efekat na ljude.

„Mozak miša ima mnogo sličnosti sa ljudskim mozgom. Oni imaju iste granice krvi i neurona u mozgu,” izjavio za BBC. „Imamo dobar razlog da verujemo da sve ono šta se dešava u mozgu miševa, dešava se i u mozgu ljudi.”

Prof. Leif Salford,
Lund University

Profesor Salford je izjavio da su velike šanse da izloženost zračenju mobilnih telefona može dovesti do Alchajmerove bolesti kod ljudi. „Ono što želim da kažem je da neuroni koji su više skloni Alchajmerovoj bolesti mogu biti stimulisani ranije u životu.”

„Međutim, ova teorija je hipotetička. Mi još nemamo dokaze da je ljudski mozak afektiran na ovaj način.”

Studija je objavljena u časopisu „Perspektive zdrave životne okoline” koji izdaje Nacionalni institut za nauku o zdravoj životnoj okolini pri američkoj vladi. U ovoj studiji istraživači su zaključili: „Ne možemo isključiti mogućnost da nakon nekoliko decenija korišćenja, čitava generacija korisnika može da pati od negativnih efekata čak i u njihovom srednjem dobu.”

Dalja istraživanja

Profesor Salford kaže da ovi nalazi ne treba da utiču na korisnike mobilnih telefona. „Ovo otkriće je negativno i ne izgleda dobro.”Ali, ovo je samo eksperiment u laboratoriju sa malim brojem životinja. Ova studija biće ponovljena pre nego što, zaista, budemo pogođeni. U svakom slučaju, ovo je više nego dovoljno da se sprovode nova istraživanja u ovoj oblasti.„

Profesor Salford je dodao: ”Možda stalno približivanje mobilnog telefona glavi i nije tako dobro u dužem periodu. Možda bi trebalo početi i sa razmišljanjem o smanjenju upotrebe mobilnih telefona.„

Istraživanje koje finansirala britanska vlada, objavljeno pre tri godine, nije otkrilo dokaze o štetnosti mobilnih telefona.

Međutim, izveštaj Nezavisne grupe eksperata za mobilne telefone preporučuje da tinejdžeri koriste mobilne telefone samo onda kada je to zaista neophodno i da razgovori budu što je moguće kraći.

Izvor:

http://www.pxds.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=183&Itemid=6&lang=serbian_lat”

TELEFONSKI RELEJI UGROŽAVAJU MILIONE ŽIVOTA

Svetski renomirani stručnjak za štetno delovanje elektromagnetnih polja i mikrotalasne radijacije upozorio je da zapadne vlade stavljaju milione života u opasnost dopuštajući nastavak i neograničeno korišćenje mobilnih telefona.

U ekskluzivnom intervjuu za The Courier iz Stockholma, u broju od 8. marta 2005, profesor Olle Johansson naveo je da su škotske izvršne vlasti trebale da obustave izgradnju, odnosno puštanje u rad svih mobilnih releja i započnu hitnu istragu o njihovim dugoročnim štetnim efektima na zdravlje stanovnistva.

Dok je on tvrdio da je celo stanovništvo bilo u opasnosti zbog stalne izloženosti elektromagnetnoj radijaciji, bez obzira na to u čijem su vlasništvu mobiteli, najnovija istraživanja potvrdila su da su štetnim zračenjima više podložna deca kod kojih je utvrđeno rano oštećenje nervnih stanica.

Profesor Johansson komentarisao je nakon kampanje protiv mobitelnih releja na St. Andrews-u kojoj je dao punu podršku: „Osnovna naučna tema nije prvenstveno o tačnom sedištu bazne stanice nego o tome da li je u redu da se ozrači celo stanovništvo. To je eksperiment na ljudima, uz mene i na vama i na deci u St Andrews-u.”

Profesor Johansson, neurolog u Karolinskom institutu u Stockholmu finansiranom od vlade, ima više od 20 godina iskustva. Bio je prvi koji je studirao ljudsku osetljivost na štetna zračenja mobitela kada su, sredinom 1990-ih godina, nepovoljne reakcije bile registrovane i prijavljene.

Tokom 2005. posetio je Škotsku u kojoj su potencijalni zdravstveni rizici povezani s izloženošću ljudi mobilnim telefonima i relejima. Takođe se pojavio i kao ekspert pred skupštinskim odborom o javnim peticijama i na raspravama u Aberdeenshire-u i Perth-u.

Profesor Johansson je nazvao „zabrinjavajućim” brojna zapažanja u celom svetu koja povezuju zdravstvene probleme sa telekomunikacijskim baznim stanicama. Ako se pokaže da je ovo pogrešno, onda bi i mnoge opservacije i naučna istraživanja trebalo da budu pogrešni.

„Nedavne studije, moje i mojih saradnika, pokazuju da je 1997. vrlo ”radoznala„ godina u Švedskoj, u kojoj je veliki broj povezanih zdravstvenih mera odjednom počeo da ukazuje na brzo pogoršavanje zdravlja švedske populacije. Neke karakteristike zdravlja i bolesti izgleda da imaju korelaciju sa švedskim uvođenjem globalnih sistema mobilnih komunikacija (GSM) sa intenzitetom od 1800 MHz .

”Nova studija, objavljena u martu 2005, takođe ukazuje na akutne efekte od pulsirajućih mikrotalasa. Oštećenje nervnih stanica zapaža se već nakon 30 minuta od 6 W/kg izloženosti mikrotalasima od 1,25 GHz radijacije isporučene kao 5,9 mikrosekundarnih pulseva ponovljene frekvencije od 10 Hz. Na osnovu tog dokaza, autori su zaključili da izloženost mikrotalasima prourokuje promene nervne ultra strukture na način koji je u zavisnosti od mikrotalasne frekvencije i metaboličkih neuronskih veza.„

”Područje odabrano za istraživanje od velike je važnosti za poremećaje kao što su Parkinsonova bolest i druge. Naravno, rezultati mogu imati ogroman uticaj na zdravlje dece koja su mnogo više osetljiva na rano oštećenje nervnih stanica.„

Profesor Johansson ističe da vlada treba da se suoči sa svojom odgovornošću i podrži finansiranje nezavisnih istraživanja. On je rekao da profitabilne kompanije za mobilnu telefoniju nisu odgovorne za ovaj problem, jer one samo slede vladine smernice.

Posljedni protest protiv mobitelne tehnologije upozorava na to da hiljade učenika i stanovnika rizikuju svoje zdravlje ako se odobri izgradnja releja treće generacije (3G) mobilnih telefona na Grange Road-u, na periferiji St. Andrews-a.

Problemi se gomilaju dok cela nacija nastavlja da vodi rasprave o mogućim zdravstvenim rizicima od TETRA policijskih komunikacijskih i releja mobilne telefonije. Obje tehnologije su povezane s poremećajima funkcije mozga, povećanja krvnog pritiska, mučnine, vrtoglavice, glavobolje, neplodnosti i ubrzanog rasta tumora.

Izvor:

http://www.pxds.com//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=6”

Ima meraca zracenja , jedino sto podzemne vode ne mogu da se izmere sa njima, one se mere putem radiestezijskih uredjaja i osobe koja se razume u to...

U svakom slučaju danas je vise nego neopodno da covek bude informisan i preduzme korake dalje..

Computer Radiation Now at Danger Level...

If you are a computer user, computer radiation may be your largest single source of electromagnetic radiation.

Although the intensity of radiation from computers may be far less than from, say, a high-voltage power line, people get much closer to their PC.

Many of us spend our working days in front of computer monitors, surrounded by nearby electronic equipment, each item emitting radiation. Because of the duration of this exposure (many hours every day), computer radiation is a real health hazard.

This type of radiation, known as Extremely Low Frequency (ELF), is also emitted from power lines, electrical sub-stations, TVs and other electrical and electronic appliances.

Another type of dangerous electromagnetic radiation found near computers is microwave radiation. Microwaves are used to provide radio communication between wireless-networked equipment, including computers, printers, modems, routers and other cordless or wi-fi devices.

A typical computer user, not too careful about equipment choice and placement, could be exposed to

Type of Radiation


Field Strength

ELF radiation from computers


3-6 milligauss

Microwave from wi-fi devices


100-200 µW/m2

Each of these levels individually is far from safe. Taken together they create a very serious health risk.

Fortunately there are simple measures to reduce this radiation, which you will read about on this page.
Computer Radiation Health Effects

For many years it has been known that ELF radiation can cause, or contribute to, various health problems - ranging from sleep interference and allergic reactions, through to heart disease, cancer and alzheimer's disease.

Most people would not want to sit at a desk under high voltage power lines. But they will happily sit a foot away from a computer screen, with a computer and printer on the desk next to them, and perhaps a power supply (UPS) near their feet.

They will work like this for several hours every day, for many years, absorbing as much (or more) ELF radiation than if their desk was close to a high-voltage power line!
Computer radiation is easily subdued!

Computers contain power supplies, fans, drives and other electrical units which generate ELF radiation strong enough to cause concern at distances up to about 60 cm (about 2 feet).

For example, the desktop PCs in our office each produce computer radiation of about 1 milligauss (borderline safe) at 60 cm, stronger towards the rear of the unit.

The magnetic portion of this electromagnetic radiation is the most dangerous part. It can penetrate just about anything (including, of course, you). It does not help to place a shield or screen between you and the computer.

But this ELF radiation naturally falls away very quickly with increasing distance, because the radiation is from a low power source.

The simple solution is to position your computer as far away from you as cables allow (at least 60 cm, preferably more). If possible, keep it on the floor, not on your desk.

You want to minimise the computer radiation to all parts of your body, but especially your head and your trunk.
Computer monitor radiation

The item most likely to cause a health hazard in some offices is the computer monitor, or screen. The old box-shaped cathode-ray tube (CRT) computer monitors generally have quite high levels of radiation at around 30 cm.

The CRT computer monitor in our office produced 3 milligauss of radiation at 30 cm, measured from the front and 4 milligauss at the same distance from the sides. This is a fairly recent model. Computer monitor radiation from older equipment can be even higher.

A constant 3 mG of computer monitor radiation is a health hazard in itself, but remember that this same user is probably also absorbing low-frequency radiation from computers, printers, power supplies (ups), florescent lights and mobile phones as well as microwave energy from wireless modems, routers, networks and printers.

No wonder computer users get sick so often!

Fortunately, technology has come to our aid with the LCD monitor (the flat one), which emits minimal radiation. For example, the LCD screens in our office create an EMF of 0.3 milligauss at 30 cm, from the front or back - and practically nothing at the sides. This is a much safer level.

More recent still are LED monitors. I have one fitted to my laptop. EMF levels on this monitor are very similar to the LCD monitors, so nothing to worry about there.

If you use the older CRT type for long periods every day, perhaps it's time it was replaced. (Speak to the boss!)

Pregnant women should be particularly careful about using CRT screens - which have been associated with higher rates of miscarriage and possibly birth defects.
Laptop radiation

Laptop or notebook computer radiation is generally lower than from desktop PCs, partly because the components are smaller, the laptop is battery-operated and the laptop screen is invariably an LCD or LED.

But the problem with laptop radiation is that you may be very close to it indeed, especially if you operate the laptop on your laptop!

In fact, laptop radiation may be as little as 1 milligauss at 30cm, but as much as 20 milligauss at point-blank range.

So keep your distance when operating your laptop computer. It should be positioned on a table or desk. Make sure that you are at least 30 cm away from it (except for your hands on the keyboard) to minimise computer radiation. A separate keyboard and mouse (not wireless!) would also be a good idea.

Laptop computers produce RF EMF when they are being used wirelessly, either with wi-fi or 3G connectivity. I use the wireless capabilities of my laptop for short periods when I am on holiday, but for normal usage in my office, I use a cable connection, and keep my laptop's wireless ability switched off.

EMF from netbook computers (the little jobs) is similar to that from notebooks.

The Kindle book reading device produces no EMF in normal use. (The page display uses no power.) Only the tiniest flicker on my Trifield needle was observed when the page-turn button was pressed. But when using wi-fi or 3G communications a substantial RF EMF is produced, similar to a cellphone or laptop computer.
Radiation from computer power supply (UPS)

Many people have a UPS (uninterruptible power supply) to provide backup power for their computers. These little guys pack a powerful radiation punch.

My UPS produces radiation of 20 milligauss at 30 cm, and over 1 milligauss at 1 metre, even when apparently switched off (but still connected to mains electricity, and charging its battery).

If you need a UPS, position it as far away from yourself and others as cables allow - I suggest at least 1.5 metres.
Radiation from larger computer/office equiment.

For larger (generally floor-standing) computer equipment such as printers, photocopiers, mini-computers and all racked equipment, assume that a substantial amount of computer radiation will be produced, unless you know differently.

Position these items at a safe distance (at least 1.5 metres) from where people work. (The occasional visit to the photocopier or printer need not be a cause for concern, because the duration is short).

For mainframe computer operators, engineers and other personnel, it is essential to measure both types of radiation with suitable meters, and minimise your contact with high-EMF areas.
Radiation from printers and other computer devices

Small (desktop) computer printers generally produce less than 0.5 milligauss at 60cm in standby mode and up to twice that amount when printing. As this is probably not be the only source of computer radiation at your desk, do not keep your printer too close to you.

Some corded desktop devices are practically harmless, including keyboards, mouses(!), small speakers and modems. The same applies to telephones (landlines only). You can have these as close as you like.

Large sub-woofers that are becoming popular as part of a home computer's sound system can emit more than just (astonishing levels of) bass - ours produces 20 milligauss of ELF radiation at 0 cms, 3 mG at 60 cm (1') and .5 mG at 60 cm (2') whenever the speaker is powered (even when it is producing no sound).

So don't use your sub-woofer as a footrest! It needs to be at least 90 cm (3') away from you. (Closer than that it would deafen you anyway!)
Wi-fi Radiation from wireless networks, routers, printers and modems

Wi-fi information networks, wireless routers, modems and other wireless devices are becoming very pervasive. All of them emit electromagnetic radiation, mainly microwave or radio (also known as RF) radiation, as they keep in touch with each other.

These wireless devices are not safe. In fact there is strong evidence that the information content (pulsed digital signal added on to the microwave carrier) may interfere with biological processes.

Wi-fi networks are now installed in many public and private places. You may be exposed to them without knowing it.

Most concerning is the practice in some schools of installing wi-fi networks in the computer centre and classrooms. Children are particularly vulnerable to electromagnetic radiation. Schools and libraries should always install wired networks.

Achieving acceptable computer radiation levels

In most cases, applying these recommendations will cause computer radiation to be reduced to acceptable levels.

For example, in the small office where I work (about eight hours a day with two other people) there are three desktop computers and one laptop. We have arranged the office to minimise computer radiation for all of us:

Computer (tower) cases are all on the floor next to the user's desk, as far away from the user as possible.
The UPS is far away from everyone - at max cable stretch.

Screens are all LCD.

There is no cordless equipment (keyboard, mouse, telephone etc.) in our office.

On a table next to my desk are two desktop printers and a laptop computer. The nearest printer is about 75 cm (30„) away from me. At this distance my EMF meter can barely detect it's presence.

The computers and printers are all networked together into our (wired) office network .

Our internet connection is by DSL with a wired modem connected to a wired telephone line.

I don't think there is much more we can do to reduce computer radiation, unless we change our line of work! So what's the result?
Zero Radiation? Not quite

At my desk, my feet are exposed to electromagnetic radiation of about 0.5 milligauss and my head to about 0.2 milligauss, with an average whole body EMF of about 0.3 mG. The two other people who share this office have similar levels.

Microwave radiation levels in the office are fairly low (about 0.15 microwatts/m2). The microwave radiation is probably due entirely to the cell phone tower, which I estimate is just over 400 metres away.

I'd prefer zero radiation, but in the real world one has to accept a small amount!”