Ovaj clanak o Srebrenici nudi puno odgovora i naravno pitanja zašto su mediji i kako su mediji pisali o žrtvama...
Politicka instrumentalizacija medija.

http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/herman200710.html

Zakljucak:
Another Srebrenica memorial myth is that the memorial and political actions associated with it are necessary for real peace. In the words of the EU resolution, „there cannot be real peace without justice,” which means getting Mladic into court, and this is essential for „reconciliation” so that „civilians of all ethnicities may overcome the tensions of the past.” But how about justice for the thousands of Serbs killed from the UN-protected Srebrenica base between 1992 and July 1995, the 250,000 driven out of Krajina in Operation Storm, and the thousands of Serbs and Roma driven out of Kosovo since the NATO takeover and installation of the KLA in power? NATO's bombing war against Yugoslavia in March-June 1999 was in violation of the UN Charter, killed many hundreds of civilians, and involved the use of illegal weapons (cluster bombs, depleted uranium). Don't we need criminal prosecutions in these cases for justice and reconciliation? Furthermore, doesn't huge attention to a one-sided remembrance and memorial create rešentments and assure long-term ethnic hostilities? Can't it be used by the preferred side to keep the pot boiling, rub salt in the wounds of their enemies, and obtain financial and political advantages from their powerful Western supporters?

The memorials and EU Resolution are not designed for peace and reconciliation; they are a continuation of the war of pacification and vengeance against Serbia and a means of showing that the ongoing U.S.-NATO militarization and permanent global „war of terror” is a fight against evil.