„Koliko je nekada bila regulisana i sređena, proizvodna i inovativna toliko je danas sve suprotno.”
------------

Nije bas 'sve' ali nije ni mnogo ostalo od kako je ta Amerika nekada bila (50+g.) zahvaljujuci tehnoloskom razvoju i globalizaciji koja je dovela ceo svet, pa i samu Ameriku tu gde je danas!

Kakve promene će nam Trump-ov „Make America Great Again” vremenom doneti preostaje nam da se vidi, a u međuvremenu idemo po onoj nasoj staroj uzrecici; - uzdaj se u se i u svoje kljuse. 😊

FYI

„A Deeper Look at the Senate Health Bill
Stephanie Armour

Here's a deeper look at what the Senate plan would do:

Medicaid: The plan would roll back the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion more gradually than the House version would, but would ultimately make deeper cuts to the program. While states' funding from Washington would be capped for the first time in the history of the Medicaid program, states would be given a choice of the formula used -- 'block grants' or 'per capita caps' -- to curb it under the bill.

Penalties: The bill would end the ACA’s much-debated requirement that most Americans pay a penalty if they don’t have insurance. The bill also suspends the so-called Cadillac tax on generous employer health benefits through 2025.

Subsidies: The bill would keep Obamacare's current tax credits to provide subsidies to people who don’t get health insurance on the job, but the bill would lower income eligibility for the assistance, meaning fewer people would be able to get the subsidies. The credits would also be less robust than under the ACA.

Planned Parenthood: The bill would strip federal funding from Planned Parenthood Federation of America for one year. It also prohibits tax credits from being used to purchase plans that offer abortion coverage.

ACA Taxes: Like the House bill, the Senate bill would repeal a 3.8% tax on investment income retroactively to January 2017 and delay the repeal of a 0.9% payroll tax until 2023.
Both of those taxes only apply to individuals making more than $200,000 and married couples making more than $250,000.”

http://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/senate-republicans-unveil-obamacare-repeal-bill
Dobro ili loše (nam se piše)?

Zemljace, u svakoj administraciji postoji birokratija, a razlika između jedne administracije (rep. & dem.) i druge je samo u nijansama, ali i pore sveha šta se može naći u kom zakonu sustina je koliko šta sluzi običnim smrtnicima a koliko izvan njih.

ACA Bill (H.R. 3962) je koliko toliko pokrivao potrebe zdravstvenog osiguranja za 23+ miliona gradjana koji nisu imali ikakvo ili čak dovoljno osiguranje mada nije bio idealan jer politicki opozicija je bojkotovala bilo koji doprinos poboljsanju nacrta zakona.

Pre ACA ja sam mogao da placam premiju od $1,546+/mo za osobu u familoiji sa pre-existing condition ali koliko njih nije bilo u mogućnosti da se nosi sa tim MESECNIM izdatkom samo za zdravstveno osiguranje, a gde su sve ostale potrebstine.

Ovo sto je danas GOP izneto će dovesti mnoge da se zapitaju cemu sve to vodi osim saveopsteg haosa u zdravstvu i drustvu kao celina.

ACA nije bio dovoljno dobar a ovo što se predstavlja od GOP je još daleko dalje čak i od 'dovoljno' a kamoli dobrog zdravstenog osiguranja o kojem izvesni politicari da na brzaka progiraju sve to (iduce nedelje.

A što se tiče samog ACA zakona on je predstavljen na 1,990 stranica i vredno ga je procitati u celini pre nego što se odbaci u smece!

Pogledaj ovde:
http://housedocs.house.gov/rules/health/111_ahcaa.pdf